Telangana

Hyderabad

CC/398/2016

Y Vijayeshwar Rao - Complainant(s)

Versus

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner - Opp.Party(s)

M NarsingRao

31 Jul 2019

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM I HYDERABAD
(9th Floor, Chandravihar Complex, M.J. Road, Nampally, Hyderabad 500 001)
 
Complaint Case No. CC/398/2016
( Date of Filing : 21 Mar 2016 )
 
1. Y Vijayeshwar Rao
S/o. Y.V. Krishnaiah, Age 68, Occ. Retd. Employee, H.No.LIG-35, Opp. Saibaba Temple, Lalapet, Secunderabad
Secunderabad
Telangana
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Through its Commissioner, Barkatpura, Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Telangana
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. P. Vijender PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. D.Nirmala MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 31 Jul 2019
Final Order / Judgement

    

     BEFORE THE HON’BLE  DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSEL

                                        FORUM-I   AT HYDERABAD                  

 SRI P.VIJENDER, B.Sc., L.L.B, PRESIDENTT

                                SMT. D.NIRMALA, B.Com., LLB., MEMBER

                                                                        

                                                  CC  No. 398/2016

Between:

 

Sri Y.Vijayeshwar Rao,

S/o. Y.V.Krishnaiah,

Age 68 years, Occ: Retd. Employee,

H.No. LIG – 35, Opp: Saibaba Temple

Lalapet,  Sercunderabad.

                                                                            …. ….   Complainant.

   

A  n d

 

Regional Provident  Fund Commissioner,

Through its Commissioner,

Barkathpura, Hyderabad.                                          …..opposite party.

 

 

Counsel for  the Complainant               : Mr.Narsingrao

Counsel for Opposite party                   :  Mr.K.Raghuram Reddy

                       DOCKET ORDER DATED 31.7.2019

 

 

Complainant is called absent and no representation.As seen from docket proceedings after  filing of evidence affidavit on 20.2.2017 the complainant and his counsel on record have stopped appearing in the complaint.Documents are also not marked for complainant and it appeared complainant is not interested in prosecuting the complaint.Hence complaint is dismissed for default.

 

 

            MEMBER                                                                             PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. P. Vijender]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. D.Nirmala]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.