Haryana

StateCommission

A/340/2022

DINCO MOTORS - Complainant(s)

Versus

RAM KISHAN AND OTHERS - Opp.Party(s)

ANIL KUMAR SHARMA

11 Nov 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

 

                                                         

                                                          Date of Institution: 22.07.2022

                                                          Date of final hearing: 11.11.2024

                                                          Date of Pronouncement: 11.11.2024

 

 

APPEAL NO.340 OF 2022

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF

 

Dinco Motors Bawal Road, Rewari through its Manager/Authorized Representative Mahesh Kumar, aged about 45 years son of Bhim Singh, resident of Village Mastapur, District Rewari. Aadhaar Card No.590053342713 and Mobile No.7082100203.

 

 

 

                                             ….Appellant/Opposite Party No.1

 

Versus

 

 

1. Ram Kishan, aged 48 years son of Shri Parbhu, resident of House No.411, Village Siha Sub Tehsil Dahina, District Rewari.

 

1. Respondent No.1/Complainant

 

2. National Insurance Company Ltd. having its office at Division No.10, Flat No.101-106, N-1 MBC, House Connaught Place, New Delhi through its authorized representative.

 

3. New India Assurance Company Ltd. having its Divisional Office at 310400, E-9 Connaught House, Second Floor, Connaught Circus, New Delhi-110001 through its Branch Manager, Branch Office at Kath Mandi Circular Road, Rewari, Tehsil and District Rewari.

 

 

1. Respondents No.2 & 3/Opposite Parties No.2 & 3

         

CORAM:   Hon’ble Mr. Justice T.P.S. Mann, President

                   MR. S.P. SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                   Mrs. manjula, member

                                                                                               

 

Present:     Shri Anil Kumar Sharma, counsel for the appellant.

                   Shri Mukesh Yadav, counsel for respondent No.1.

                   Shri Amit Kundra, counsel for respondent No.2.

                   Shri Vinod Chaudhri, counsel for respondent No.3.

                  

                  

                

 

PER: T.P.S. MANN, J.

 

ORDER

 

1. Counsel appearing for respondent No.1 has filed the vakalatnama, which is taken on record.
2. Counsel appearing for the appellant states that respondent No.2 i.e. National Insurance Company Ltd. has paid the entire awarded amount to the complainant and under these circumstances the appellant wishes to withdraw the present appeal.
3. Counsel appearing for respondent No.1/complainant confirms the factum of payment having been made by respondent No.2 and therefore he has no objection, if, the appellant is granted permission to withdraw the present appeal.
4. The appeal is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Application(s) pending, if any, stand disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order.
6. The statutory amount of Rs.25,000/- deposited by the appellant at the time of filing the appeal be refunded to the appellant against proper receipt and identification but in accordance with rules.
7. A copy of this order be provided to the parties free of cost as mandated by the law. The order be uploaded forthwith on the website of the Commission for the perusal of the parties.
8. File be consigned to record room along with a copy of this order.

 

 

 

(T.P.S. MANN)

PRESIDENT

 

(S.P. SOOD)

JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

(MANJULA)

MEMBER

 

 

 

 

Pronounced On: 11.11.2024

DR