NCDRC

NCDRC

FA/261/2008

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI - Complainant(s)

Versus

RAKESH DHAWAN & ORS - Opp.Party(s)

MR. AMIT K. PAUL

22 Jan 2014

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

NEW DELHI

FIRST APPEAL NO. 261 OF 2008

(Against the Order dated 27/05/2008 in Complaint No. 110/2006 of the State Commission Delhi)

1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI Town Hall Delhi	...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. RAKESH DHAWAN & ORS F-1179, C.R. Park New Delhi Delhi 2. A.K. BHATNAGAR 97, Chitra Vihar Delhi 3. PURSHOTTAM SINGH J-8/130, Rajouri Garden Delhi 4. UNION OF INDIA Through its Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Nirman Bhavan New Delhi Delhi 5. GOVERNMENT OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Through its Chief Secretary, Indrapastha Estate New Delhi Delhi 6. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Through its Chairperson, Parliament Street New Delhi Delhi 7. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through its Vice Chairman, I.N.A. New Delhi Delhi 8. DELHI JAL BOARD Through its Chief Executive Officer, Varunalaya, Jhandewalan New Delhi Delhi 9. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Through its Joint Commissioner of Police (Traffic), Indraprastha Estate New Delhi Delhi 10. STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY Through its Joint Commissioner/Secretary, 5/9, Under Hill Road Delhi 11. DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH SERVICES Government of N.C.T. of Delhi Delhi	...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
	HON'BLE MRS. REKHA GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER

For the Appellant :

Nemo

For the Respondent :

For the Respondents no.1 to 3 : Mr. R.K. Dhawan, Advocate with Ms. Richa Dhawan, Advocate For the Respondent no.4 : Nemo For the Respondent no.5 : Nemo For the Respondent no.6 : Mr.______(Appearance not legible) For the Respondent no.7 : Mr.Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocate with Ms. Manika Tripathy, Advocate For the Respondent no.8 : Mr. A.K. Singh, Advocate For the Respondent no.9 : Mr. Vaibhav Massey, Advocate For the Respondent no.10 : Nemo For the Respondent no.1 1 : Nemo

Dated : 22 Jan 2014

ORDER

On the first call no one was present on behalf of appellant. On the second call also, no one is present. Hence, the appeal is dismissed in default.

......................

REKHA GUPTA

PRESIDING MEMBER