Kerala

Kozhikode

CC/198/2022

MUHAMMED SHEREEF - Complainant(s)

Versus

RAJARAM MOBILER ACCESSORIES - Opp.Party(s)

24 Jan 2023

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KARANTHUR PO,KOZHIKODE
 
Complaint Case No. CC/198/2022
( Date of Filing : 11 Aug 2022 )
 
1. MUHAMMED SHEREEF
KUTTIKKATTOOR, KOZHIKODE
KOZHIKODE
KERALA
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. RAJARAM MOBILER ACCESSORIES
RAJARAM MOBILER ACCESSORIES, STATION ROAD RAM NAGAR, THANE
THANE
MAHARASHTRA
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. P.C .PAULACHEN , M.Com, LLB PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. V. BALAKRISHNAN ,M TECH ,MBA ,LLB, FIE Member
 HON'BLE MRS. PRIYA . S , BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 24 Jan 2023
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOZHIKODE

PRESENT : Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN, M.Com, LLB : PRESIDENT

Smt. PRIYA.S, BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) :  MEMBER

Sri.V. BALAKRISHNAN, M Tech, MBA, LL.B, FIE: MEMBER

Tuesday the 24th day of  January, 2023

C.C.198/2022

Complainant

 

Muhammed Shareef,

Kuttikkattoor, Peringolam P.O,

Kozhikode – 673 571.

 

Opposite Party

 

Rajaram Mobile Accessories,

Station Road, Ram Nagar,

Thane – 421 201.

 

  

  1.  

 

 

 

By Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN – PRESIDENT 

           This is a complaint filed under section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

  1. The case of the complainant , in brief, is as follows;

 

The complainant boughtAHP pen drive from Flipkart with a warranty of 2 years. But it is not workingproperly. So he approached the opposite party, theauthorizedservice centre. But they did not receive the product stating that it is a fake one. Hence the complaint.

 

  1. The opposite party was set ex-parte.
  2. The points that arise for determination in this case are :
  1. Whether  there was any deficiency of service on the part of the opposite party, as alleged ?
  2. Reliefs and costs.

 

  1. Point No.1 –  The opposite party was set as ex-parte. The case was  posted for  evidence of the complainant  several times . But the complainant also remained absent and did not file affidavit or adduce any evidence.  The fact that the opposite party was set ex-parte does not automatically entitles the complainant to get the relief sought for. It is for the  complainant to prove the allegations in the complaint by adducing proper evidence. But the complainant  in this case has utterly failed to prove his case. No deficiency of service as alleged is proved against the opposite party.

 

  1. Point No.2 :  In view of the finding on the above point, the complainant is not entitled to get the relief sought for and the complaint is only  to be dismissed. 

 

In the result, CC 198/2022 is dismissed.No order as to costs.

 

Pronounced in open Commissionon this the 24th day of January,2023.

 

Date of Filing: 11/08/2022

                                                                                                  

 

 

                                                    

  

                                               

APPENDIX

                                                  NIL

                                                                                                    

                                                                                                                                                Sd/-  

                                         PRESIDENT                

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Sd/-

                            MEMBER

                                                                                                                                              Sd/-

                             MEMBER

 

 

                                                                                                                              Forwarded/By Order

                                                                                                                                          Sd/-

                                                                                                                           Assistant Registrar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. P.C .PAULACHEN , M.Com, LLB]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V. BALAKRISHNAN ,M TECH ,MBA ,LLB, FIE]
Member
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PRIYA . S , BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM)]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.