Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/208/2022

Sajeed - Complainant(s)

Versus

Raj Raj cotton - Opp.Party(s)

01 Aug 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/208/2022
( Date of Filing : 26 May 2022 )
 
1. Sajeed
Tirvnadrum
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Raj Raj cotton
Tirvnadrum
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 01 Aug 2022
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

SRI.  P.V. JAYARAJAN                              :           PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR                           :           MEMBER

SRI. VIJU  V.R.                                             :           MEMBER

C.C.No. 208/2022 Filed on 26/05/2022

ORDER DATED: 01/08/2022

 

Complainant

:

Sajeed, S/o.Ahamad Ali, Irfana Mansil, Aaluninnavila, Kovalam.

Opposite party

:

Ramraj Cottan, Pattom Jn., Pattom.P.O., Thiruvananthapuram.

(By Adv.Suja Madhav)

ORDER

 

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN: PRESIDENT

This is a complaint filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration.After hearing the matter the commission passed an order as follows:

This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite party alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party.  When the case came up for consideration on 07/07/2022 the matter was referred for settlement talk and on discussion the matter was settled on condition that the cloth material purchased by the complainant from the opposite party shall be replaced by the opposite party.  Hence the matter was adjourned to 29/07/2022 for reporting settlement.  On 29/07/2022 the complainant was absent and the opposite party represented that the cloth material was replaced to the complainant.  As the complainant was absent the complainant was contacted over phone and the complainant confirmed that the matter is settled and he will appear before this Commission today to report settlement.  When the case came up for consideration the complainant was absent and opposite party’s counsel represented.  In view of the settlement confirmation given by the complainant over phone on 29/07/2022.  We find that this is a fit case to be dismissed as settled.

In the result the complaint is dismissed as settled.  There will be no order as to cost.

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 01st  day of August,  2022.

 

Sd/-

P.V. JAYARAJAN

:

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR

 

:

 

      MEMBER

Sd/-

VIJU  V.R.

:

MEMBER

 

R

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.