Haryana

StateCommission

RP/1/2022

MANAPPURAM FINANCE LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

RAJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER - Opp.Party(s)

S.C. THATAI

11 Feb 2022

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Revision Petition No. RP/1/2022
( Date of Filing : 27 Jan 2022 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. 143/2021 of District Fatehabad)
 
1. MANAPPURAM FINANCE LTD.
FIRST FLOOR, G.T.ROAD, NEAR RED LIGHT CHOWK, ABOVE MRF SHOWROOM,
FATEHABAD
HARYANA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. RAJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER
BHATIA DEPOT WALI GALI, WARD NO. 12,
FATEHABAD
HARYANA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  A S Narang, PRESIDING MEMBER
  Suresh Chander Kaushik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 11 Feb 2022
Final Order / Judgement

 

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

HARYANA PANCHKULA

 

                                                                                                                                                                      Revision Petition No.01 of 2022

   Date of the Institution:27.01.2022

                                                                                                                                                               Date of Decision:11.02.2022

 

          Manappuram Finance Limited, First Floor, G.T. Road, Near Red Light Chowk, Above MRF Showroom, Fatehabad, District Fatehabad, Haryana through its Authorized Signatory Shri Raghav Aggarwal.

                                                                                                .…. Petitioner

Versus

1.      Raj Kumar S/o Shri Bhagwan Dass, R/o Bhatia Depot Wali Gali, Ward No.12, Fatehabad, Tehsil & District Fatehabad (Haryana).

    .….Respondent

2.      Manappuram Finance Limited, A-Wing, 3rd Floor, Unit No.301 to 313, Kanakia Wali Street, Andheri Kurla Road, ANdheri East Mumbai-400093.

                                        .….Performa Respondent.

CORAM:    Mr.A S Narang, Judicial Member.

                   Mr. Suresh Chander Kaushik, Member.

 

Present:-    Mr. Nitin Thatai, counsel for the Petitioner.

                  

                                                O R D E R

A.S. NARANG, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

(The matter has been heard through virtual hearing).

                    Mr. Nitin Thati, counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to pursue the present Revision Petition at this stage. He states that he would file the written reply on behalf of Respondent No.2 before the District Consumer Commission. In case, the District Consumer Commission does not permit him to file the written reply on behalf of Respondent No.2 on the next date of hearing i.e. 03.03.2022, he would file a fresh Revision Petition before this Commission against the order which would be passed by  District Consumer Commission .

 

 

2.                In view of the statement made by Mr. Nitin Thatai, counsel for the petitioner, present Revision Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. File be consigned to the record room.

 

 

February 11th, 2022                           Suresh Chander Kaushik                A S Narang                                                                     Member                                             Judicial Member

                                                            Addl. Bench                                      Addl. Bench   

                                                                       

J.Y.

 
 
[ A S Narang,]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[ Suresh Chander Kaushik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.