Kerala

Kottayam

CC/81/2018

James Mathew - Complainant(s)

Versus

Quatar Airways - Opp.Party(s)

Anil D kartha

29 Sep 2021

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kottayam
Kottayam
 
Complaint Case No. CC/81/2018
( Date of Filing : 27 Apr 2018 )
 
1. James Mathew
Palamoottil House Thellokam PO
Kottayam
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Quatar Airways
Kochi City Office Le Meridien Mazzanine Floor Maradu P.o Kochi
Eranakulam
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Bindhu R MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 29 Sep 2021
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM

Dated this the 29th day of September, 2021

 

Present:  Sri. Manulal V.S. President

Smt. Bindhu R. Member

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member

 

C C No. 81/2018 (filed on 27-04-2018)

 

Petitioner                                            :         James Mathew,

                                                          S/o. Mathew,

                                                          Palamoottil House,

                                                          Thellakam P.O. Kottayam.

                                                          (Adv. Anil D. Kartha and

                                                          Adv. Ananthakrishnan A Kartha)

                                                                             Vs

Opposite Party                                   :    1) Quatar Airways,

                                                          Kochi City Office,

                                                          Le Meridien,

                                                          Mazzanine Floor,

                                                          Maradu P.O.  Kochi.

 

O  R  D  E  R

Sri. Manulal V.S. President   

          Complainant absent.  No representation.  Opposite party represented.  Notice of the complaint is seen served.  Complainant is continuously absent.  Despite the notice to the complainant and notice to the counsel of the complainant, he did not care to appear before the Commission and not adduce any evidence.  Hence it is clear from the conduct of the complainant, he is not interested to proceed with the complaint.  Hence the complaint is dismissed for default.

     Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 29th day of September, 2021

Sri. Manulal V.S. President             Sd/-

Smt. Bindhu R. Member                  Sd/-

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member                  Sd/-

                                                                                      By Order

                                                                         Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Bindhu R]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.