Punjab

Bhatinda

EA/10/54

Harnek Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

PSPCL - Opp.Party(s)

Sh.J.N.Sharma

12 Nov 2010

ORDER


DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.
Execution Application No. EA/10/54
1. Harnek SinghS/o Bagh Singh, aged about 71 years, R/o village Nathana BathindaPunjab ...........Appellant(s)

Versus.
1. PSPCLThe Mall, through its M.R.Aggarwal, Chairman/SecretaryPatialaPunjab ...........Respondent(s)



BEFORE:

PRESENT :Sh.J.N.Sharma, Advocate for Appellant
Sh.R.D.Goyal,O.P.s., Advocate for Respondent

Dated : 12 Nov 2010
JUDGEMENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

Statement of Sh.J.N.Sharma,counsel for the complainant W.O.


 

Stated that I have received memo no.977 dt.9.11.10 today from opposite party therefore I do not want to proceed with this complaint. I may be allowed to withdraw the complaint.


 

RO&AC

Member Member President

12.11.10.

12.11.10 Present: Sh.J.N.Sharma,counsel for the complainant.

Sh.R.D.Goyal,counsel for opposite parties.


 

In view the above statement made by counsel for the complainant, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Parties are left to bear their own costs. File be consigned.


 

Member Member President.