Kerala

Kozhikode

CC/246/2020

PREMKUMAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

PROPRIETOR,GRACE MOTORS - Opp.Party(s)

07 Nov 2023

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KARANTHUR PO,KOZHIKODE
 
Complaint Case No. CC/246/2020
( Date of Filing : 27 Nov 2020 )
 
1. PREMKUMAR
KALLASSERY HO,VELUTHEDATH MEETHAL,KOMMERI PO,KOZHIKODE
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. PROPRIETOR,GRACE MOTORS
VADAKARA-673101
2. PROPRIETOR,SERVICE CENTRE
ROYAL ENFIELD BULLET COMPANY, MANKAVU,KOZHIKODE-673007
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. P.C .PAULACHEN , M.Com, LLB PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. V. BALAKRISHNAN ,M TECH ,MBA ,LLB, FIE Member
 HON'BLE MRS. PRIYA . S , BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 07 Nov 2023
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOZHIKODE

PRESENT: Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN, M.Com, LLB          : PRESIDENT

Smt. PRIYA.S, BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) :  MEMBER

Sri.V. BALAKRISHNAN, M Tech, MBA, LL.B, FIE: MEMBER

Tuesday the 7th  day of November 2023

C.C.246/2020

 

Complainant

                  Premkumar,

S/o Sasidharan,

Kallassery (HO),

Veluthedathu Meethal,

Kommeri .P.O,

                  Kozhikode.

Opposite parties

  1.              The Proprietor,

Grace Motors,

Vadakara – 673101

Kozhikode District.

  1.               Proprietor,

Service Centre,

Royal Enfield Bullet Company,

                        Mankavu,

Kozhikode - 673007

                  

ORDER

By Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN  – PRESIDENT.

          This a complaint filed alleging deficiency of service and seeking replacement of the motor cycle with a new one or in the alternative refund of the price from the opposite parties.

  1. The first opposite party filed written version denying all allegations and claims made in the complaint. The second opposite party is set ex-parte.
  2. Today the case is posted for the affidavit of the complainant as last chance. But the complainant remained absent and there is no representation for him. The onus is on the complainant to prove the allegations. But the allegations are not proved. The complainant is continuously absent and it appears that he is not interested in pursuing the matter. The allegations are not proved.

In the result, the complaint is dismissed. No order as to costs.  

 

Pronounced in open Commission on this, the 7th day of November, 2023.

 

Date of Filing: 27/11/2020

 

                                   Sd/-                                                      Sd/-                                                               Sd/-

                          PRESIDENT                                         MEMBER                                                  MEMBER

 

 

APPENDIX

 

NIL

 

 

                                 Sd/-                                                              Sd/-                                                         Sd/-

                      PRESIDENT                                                   MEMBER                                             MEMBER

 

 

True Copy,

                                                  Sd/-

                                    Assistant Registrar.                                           

 

 

                     

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. P.C .PAULACHEN , M.Com, LLB]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V. BALAKRISHNAN ,M TECH ,MBA ,LLB, FIE]
Member
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PRIYA . S , BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM)]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.