Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/64/2012

MAHAN TEXTILES PROCESS INDIA PVT. LTD - Complainant(s)

Versus

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD, CHAIRMAN - Opp.Party(s)

B.F.S. LEGAL

31 Mar 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                                  BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                      Thiru.S.KARUPPIAH                                             ::  JUDICIAL  MEMBER

                                                       Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::   MEMBER

 

CC. No. 64/2012

                                                                  DATED THIS THE 31^st  DAY OF MARCH 2022

 

Mahan Textiles Process India (P) Ltd,

Represented by its Authorised Representative,

Mr.V.Padmanabhan,

No.47 (D) 4, Kangeyam Main Road,       

Tirupur 641 604                                                                              ..Complainant

                                                     Vs

1.New India Assurance Co.Ltd,

Represented by its Chairman,

Mr.A.R.Sekhar,

New India Assurance Building,

87, M.G.Road, Fort,

Mumbai 400 001

 

2. The Divisional Manager,

The New India Assurance Co.Ltd,

Post Box No.47, Kumaran Shopping Complex,

Kumaran Road,

Tirupur – 641 601       

 

3. The Governing Body of Insurance Council,

Represented by its Secretary General,

Shri M.V.V. Chalam,

3^rd Floor, Jeevan Seva Axxexe,

S.V.Road, Santacruz(W),

Mumbai – 400 021                                                             ..Opposite parties

 

Counsel for the Complainant                : M/s B.F.S. Legal

Counsel for the Opposite parties           : M/s Nageswaran & Narichania

 

          This complaint coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

                                                        Docket order

          No representation for complainant. Opposite parties present. This complaint is posted today for appearance of complainant and for filing written arguments of complainant and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the complainant was not present hence, passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the complainant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The complaint is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

 

           Sd/-                                             Sd/-                                                            Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL       S.KARUPPIAH                                           R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                 JUDL.MEMBER                                           PRESIDENT