NCDRC

NCDRC

FA/430/2017

JANTA LAND PROMOTERS LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

NEERAJ KAHAL & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

M/S. GUPTA LAW CHAMBER

19 May 2017

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
FIRST APPEAL NO. 430 OF 2017
 
(Against the Order dated 28/02/2017 in Complaint No. 416/2016 of the State Commission Delhi)
1. JANTA LAND PROMOTERS LTD.
at 538, PHASE X, SECTOR-64, SAS NAGAR,
MOHALI,
PUNJAB
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. NEERAJ KAHAL & ANR.
S/O. SH. Y.K. KAHAL, THROUGH THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE/SPA HOLDER SHRI RA KUMAR SINGH, S/O. LATE SHRI VASUDEO SINGH, R/O. HOUSE NO. 2322, SECTOR-66,
MOHALI,
PUNJAB
2. ANITA KAHAL W/O. NEERAJ KAHAL
THROUGH THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE/SPA HOLDER SHRI RA KUMAR SINGH, S/O. LATE SHRI VASUDEO SINGH, R/O. HOUSE NO. 2322, SECTOR-66,
MOHALI, PUNJAB
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN,PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. M. SHREESHA,MEMBER

For the Appellant :
Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate
Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Advocate
Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocate
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 19 May 2017
ORDER

Despite service no one has put in appearance on behalf of the Respondents/Complainants.  Accordingly, we have heard learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant.

Challenge in this Appeal by Janta Land Promoters Ltd., a Real Estate Developer, is to the order dated 28.02.2017, passed by the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Chandigarh (for short “the State Commission”) in Consumer Complaint No. 416 of 2016.  By the impugned order, the State Commission has closed the right of the Appellant to file its Written Version as the same was not filed within the statutory period of 45 days.  

Having heard learned Counsel for the Appellant and in view of the fact that the Complainants have chosen not to contest this Appeal as also bearing in mind the ratio of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anr. V. M/s Mampee Timbers and Hardwares Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. (Civil Appeal No. nil of 2017 - D.No. 2365 of 2017), we are of the view that the Appellant has made out a case for grant of an opportunity to file its Written Version.

Resultantly, the Appeal is allowed and the impugned order is set aside, with a direction that if the Written Version on behalf of the Appellant is filed within four weeks from today, the same shall be taken into consideration, subject to the Appellant paying to the Complainants a sum of ₹12,000/- as costs for delay in the disposal of the Complaint.  The said amount shall be in addition to the travel and allied expenses, which have already been directed to be paid.  The said amount shall be paid before the State Commission on the next date of hearing.

The Appeal stands disposed of in the above terms.

 
......................J
D.K. JAIN
PRESIDENT
......................
M. SHREESHA
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.