Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/83/2019

Mr. Vivekanandan N, aged 50 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. SUPRATIK INFRA VENTURES (P) Ltd., Having its registered Office, Kolkata - Opp.Party(s)

Sj. Biswa Ranjan Nayak & others

30 Apr 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/83/2019
( Date of Filing : 31 Dec 2019 )
 
1. Mr. Vivekanandan N, aged 50 years
S/o. M.A Narayan Menon, Presently At- P55/4, Proof Colony, Central School Road, P.S- Sahadevkhunta, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. SUPRATIK INFRA VENTURES (P) Ltd., Having its registered Office, Kolkata
At- Shree Krishna Chambers, Block-B, Room No.6C, 3rd Floor, 78, Bentinck Street, Kolkata-700001.
West Bengal
2. M/s. SUPRATIK INFRA VENTURES (P) Ltd., Bhubaneswar
Corporate Office At- Plot No.432, Lewis Road, Goutam Nagar, Bhubaneswar-751002.
Khordha
Odisha
3. Branch Manager, M/s. SUPRATIK INFRA VENTURES (P) Ltd., Balasore
Branch Office At- Alupur, O.T Road, Near Laxminarayan Temple, Balasore-756001.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 30 Apr 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case is posted today for hearing as last chance. Advocate for the complainant is absent, no steps filed. Advocate for the O.P No.3 is absent, no steps filed. O.Ps No.1 & 2 are absent, no steps filed. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up. Perused the case record.

                                         In the present case, the O.P No.3 was appeared & filed w/v. As the notices against O.Ps No.1 & 2 were sufficient and they neither appeared nor filed w/v till yet, hence the O.Ps No.1 & 2 are set ex-parte. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 23.03.20 to till today except 15.11.22, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the nature & conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.