West Bengal

Howrah

CC/288/2023

SHREE DURGA STEEL TRADER, represented by KAILASH CHAKRABORTY - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Shree Balaji Steel - Opp.Party(s)

Smritirekha Sen, Soumitra Dey

08 Jan 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HOWRAH
20, Round Tank Lane, P.O. and P.S. Howrah, Dist. Howrah-711 101.
Office (033) 2638 0892, 0512 Confonet (033) 2638 0512 Fax (033) 2638 0892
 
Complaint Case No. CC/288/2023
( Date of Filing : 28 Dec 2023 )
 
1. SHREE DURGA STEEL TRADER, represented by KAILASH CHAKRABORTY
S/o.Lt.Khagendranath Chakraborty, of 12 no. Guha Road, Ghusuri, Howrah-711102
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Shree Balaji Steel
12 no. Guha Road, Ghusuri, Howrah-711102
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Debasish Bandyopadhyay PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Dhiraj Kumar Dey MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Minakshi Chakraborty MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 08 Jan 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Order no.   2                                                                                  Date 08.01.2024.

     Today is fixed for admission hearing. Ld. Advocate on behalf of the complainant is present. Heard her submission. Gone through the papers annexed with the complaint petition.

            According to the submission of the Ld. Advocate appeared for the complainant, the present complainant is the proprietor of the company for which the present complaint is filed and its business is trading i.e. buying and selling of iron forging Finishing. Complainant delivered the round steel article of ₹15,980/- to the O.P. vide invoice no SDST/G/14/21-22 Dated 03/02/2022 for finishing the said article without any payment by the O.P. to the complainant. When we go through the above stated invoice it is found that one steel article has been delivered weighing 183Kg valued @74/- per Kg. for which the value of the goats comes to ₹15980/- including G.S.T. This invoice clearly states that the complainant has sold the goods to the O.P. for a consideration of ₹15980/- . No documents has been provided for which we can come to the conclusion that the O.P. was bound to provide some service as defined in the C.P. Act 2019 to the complainant against some consideration. Hence the complaint petition is liable to be rejected being not admitted.

            Hence it is,

ORDERED

            that the complaint case no. CC/288/2023 be and the same is rejected being not admitted and without any cost.

Dictated & corrected by me.

 

Member

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Debasish Bandyopadhyay]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dhiraj Kumar Dey]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Minakshi Chakraborty]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.