The insured had obtained various insurance policies within one month on the asking of the petitioner.  The insured died within two months of the taking of the policies.  Petitioner is not the natural son of the insured, but he has obtained the Succession Certificate.  Petitioner lodged the claim with all the companies.  Respondent had appointed an Investigator to investigate the matter about the genuineness of the claim lodged by the petitioner in CD 195/1999. 

The investigator submitted his report and as per his report, it was noticed that the respondent had obtained five janata accident policies from General Insurance Company and details of some of the polices are as under:

The claim was repudiated by the respondent on the ground that the petitioner was not entitled to claim accidental benefit from more than one insurance company.  Aggrieved by this, petitioner filed a complaint before the District Forum which was partly allowed by the District Forum vide its order dated 24.4.2006.

Respondent insurance company filed an appeal before                  the State Commission which has reversed the order of the                District Forum holding that the petitioner could not be                              permitted  to  claim  multiple  accidental  benefits  from     different

-3-

companies in terms of the policy.   We agree with the view taken by the State Commission.  There is no substance in this revision petition.  Dismissed.  No costs.