Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. This appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 31st May, 2012 of the Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission vide which the complaint was dismissed due to non-prosecution saying that none appeared on behalf of the complainant inspite of uploading the cause list on the website of the Commission on internet. 3. Since the appellant was not present before State Commission on 31st May, 2012, the delay of 40 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 4. It has been argued that the appellant belongs to rural area and he did not have access to the material loaded on the website of the Commission. It has been observed in number of cases that the State Commission has been dismissing the cases on the ground that the party was not present despite loading cause list on the website. To our opinion this practice is not desirable. 5. The appeal is, therefore, allowed and the order dated 31st May, 2012 is set aside. 6. The appellant is directed to appear before State Commission on 21-04-2014, which should issue notice to both the parties and conduct the hearing of the complaint as per procedure/law.