Madhya Pradesh

StateCommission

A/17/1448

RAMESH K. PANDIT - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S SAMSUNG INDIA LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

SH.R.B.TIWARI

05 Jul 2022

ORDER

M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL

PLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL      

 

                                  FIRST APPEAL NO. 1448 OF 2017

(Arising out of order dated 09.05.2017 passed in C.C.No.694/2016 by District Commission, Jabalpur)

 

RAMESH KUMAR PANDIT.                                                                               …          APPELLANT

 

Versus

                 

M/S SAMSUNG INDIA LIMITED & ORS.                                                            …         RESPONDENTS.                                      

 

BEFORE:

 

                  HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHANTANU S. KEMKAR     :      PRESIDENT

                 HON’BLE SHRI S.S.BANSAL                                        :      MEMBER 

                              

                                      O R D E R

05.07.2022

 

            Shri R. B. Tiwari, learned counsel for the appellant.

            Shri Akash Sahu appears on behalf of Shri Pushpendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.1.

            None for the respondent no.2 & 3.

                       

As per Shri Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar :                       

            This appeal arises out of the order dated 09.05.2017 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jabalpur (for short ‘District Commission’) in C.C.No.694/2016 whereby the District Commission has dismissed the complaint for want of prosecution.

2.                For the reasons stated in the appeal, we find that there was sufficient cause for absence of complainant/appellant and his counsel before the District Commission, when the case was called. In the circumstances, by condoning the absence of complainant/appellant, we restore the complaint to its original number by setting aside the impugned order.

-2-

3.                Parties are directed to appear before the District Commission on 03.08.2022.

4.                With the aforesaid directions, the appeal is disposed of.

 

          (Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar)             (S. S. Bansal)   

                         President                                  Member                                                                         

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.