Haryana

Charkhi Dadri

CC/19/2024

Ranbir Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s NRSS XXXVI Transmission Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Vijay Kumar

20 Feb 2024

ORDER

Present:           Sh. Vijay Jangra, Advocate for complainant.

                                                                       

                        Today the case is fixed for consideration on the maintainability of the present complaint.

                    Heard.

                        The complainant has filed the present complaint. However, the complainant does not come under ambit of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. The relevant clause i.e. 2(7) of the Consumer Protection Act is reproduced below:-

(i) buys any goods for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any user of such goods other than the person who buys such goods for consideration paid or promised or partly paid or partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment, when such use is made with the approval of such person, but does not include a person who obtains such goods for resale or for any commercial purpose; or

 (ii) hires or avails of any service for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any beneficiary of such service other than the person who hires or avails of the services for consideration paid or promised, or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment, when such services are availed of with the approval of the first mentioned person, but does not include a person who avails of such service for any commercial purpose.

                   The complainant has mentioned that he has contract with the OP and the OP has  compensated, the complainant by giving  payment for an agreegate amount of Rs.1,50,340/- which has been duly acknowledged by the complainant as evidence attached  to reply of the legal notice by the OP. The complainant has failed to place on record any congent or authentic document proving himself consumer of the OP and also any  document/report  for loss due to installation of two legs of the pole/tower  in the land of complainant.

                        Hence, we opine that it is not a fit case for summoning of OP by issuing notice by this Commission. Therefore, the complaint of complainant being not maintainable in the present form, deserves dismissal and hence, the same is hereby dismissed.

                        Copy of the order be supplied to complainant free of cost. File be consigned to the record-room.

Dated:20.02.2024