Haryana

Rohtak

EA/19/170

Mohinder singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s M2M Buildtech (P) Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Devender Hooda

21 Dec 2021

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.
Haryana.
 
Execution Application No. EA/19/170
( Date of Filing : 02 Sep 2019 )
In
Complaint Case No. 671/2017
 
1. Mohinder singh
S/o Sh. Jeet Singh R/o Village Butaau Kundu, tehsil Gohana, District Sonepat.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/s M2M Buildtech (P) Ltd.,
345, Tower B, Spaze Edge, Sector-27, Sohna Road, Gurgaon-122003 through its Principal officer/ Authorized Signatory.
2. M/s M2M Buildtech (P) Ltd.,
Branch office at kheri Sadh on Delhi Rohtak Main road, Tehsil Sampla District Rohtak through its Principal officer.
3. Pankaj Wadhwa Director,
House no. 611/23, DLF Colony, Rohtak (Haryana) India.
4. Ram Rishi Parashar
Director, M/s M2M, Buildtech (P) Ltd. r/o 925/29, Bharat colony, Model Town, Rohtak.
5. Sanjay Kumar Chugh Director Buildtech (P) Ltd.
r/o H.no. 1148/24, near Prem Das Gurudwara, Ram Nagar, Jagdish colony, Rohtak.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian PRESIDENT
  Mrs. Tripti Pannu MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 21 Dec 2021
Final Order / Judgement

                             Mohinder Vs. M2M

                                                                            

Present:          Sh.Devender Hooda, Advocate for DH.

                        Sh.Lalit Nayyar Advocate for JD No.1.

           

                        Power of attorney on behalf of JD No.1 filed. An application payment and declaration alongwith copies of Undertaking, photocopy of cheques, memo of understanding, Clarification letter regarding land and copy of agreement have been placed on record by the JDs and it has been undertaken that owners of the land of the project will not sell or transfer project land until payment of said cheques are made to the complainant/executionist. In case the payment is not made to the complainant/executionist, then the applicant has no objection if this Hon’ble Commission orders for reattaching the land. Post dated cheques of whole outstanding amount has been given to the DH  and the same has been received by the DH

                        Ld. Counsel for the DH made a statement that he has received a cheque bearing no.000363 dated 30.05.2022 amounting to Rs.200000/-(Rupees two lacs only), cheque no. 000364 dated 30.07.2022 amounting to Rs.382000/-(Rupees three lac eighty two thousand only), cheque no.000365 dated 30.09.2022 amounting to Rs.382000/-(Rupees three lac eighty two thousand only) from the judgment debtor i.e. M2M.  So he withdraw the present execution subject to clearance of cheques. 

            The payment through PDC cheques have been made by A One Homes on behalf of M2M Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. In view of the statement made by ld. Counsel for the DH, the present execution is hereby dismissed as withdrawn subject to clearance of alleged cheques. Complainant is at liberty to file the execution afresh in case of non-clearance/dishonor of cheques. Copy of this order be supplied to the parties free of cost.

                        File be consigned to the record after due compliance.

 

 

Member                                                                                 President/21.12.2021.

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Mrs. Tripti Pannu]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.