Haryana

Karnal

CC/200/2016

Gurpreet Singh S/o Jarnail Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Gurunanak Telecom - Opp.Party(s)

V.B. Bhatti

29 Mar 2017

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

                                                               Complaint No. 200 of 2016

                                                               Date of instt.: 04.07.2016

                                                                Date of decision 29.03.2017

Gurpreet Singh age 26 years son of Shri Jarnail Singh, resident of House no.128, Prem Nagar, Karnal.                                                                                                                                                                              …………..Complainant.

                                                Versus

1. M/s Gurunanak Telecom, 13 Mangal Singh Market, near Suvidha, Kunjpura Road, Karnal, through its prop/authorized signatory.

2. Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. B-1, Sector 81, Phase 2 Noida District Gautam Buddh Nagar, Uttar Pardesh, through MD/Authorized Signatory.

 

.                                                                               ………… Opposite Parties.

 

                     Complaint u/s 12  of the Consumer Protection Act.

Before:         Sh.K.C.Sharma……….President.

                   Sh.Anil Sharma…….Member.

 

Present:        Complainant in person..

                   Shri Dheeraj Sachdeva Advocate for opposite parties.

                  

ORDER:

                   Learned counsel for opposite parties made statement that opposite parties are ready to make the payment of depreciated amount of Rs.11,200/- of the invoice amount i.e.Rs.15,000/- within 30 days to the complainant subject to the condition that the complainant shall return the mobile alongwith the accessories to the opposite parties, provided the same is not in broken condition or having liquid damage.   

                   Thereafter, complainant made statement for withdrawal of the complaint by submitting that having regard to the statement of the learned counsel for the opposite parties, he does not want to pursue with the present complaint. Statements of both the parties recorded separately.

                   In view of that the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, both the parties shall be bound by their respective statements. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.  

Announced
Dated:29.3.2017

                                                                         (K.C.Sharma)

                                                                             President,

                                                                   District Consumer Disputes

                                                                    Redressal Forum, Karnal.

                             (Anil Sharma ) 

                                Member.