Kerala

Ernakulam

CC/16/118

M.A.PARTHASARATHY - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S GOPU NANDILATH G MART - Opp.Party(s)

KISHORE KUMAR

09 Jun 2017

ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
ERNAKULAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/16/118
 
1. M.A.PARTHASARATHY
PROPRIETOR,MANIMANGALATH PAINTS,ADOOR
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/S GOPU NANDILATH G MART
DOOR NO.XXXIII/1116,7,8 TOLL JUNCTIO,EDAPALLY,KOCHI-682024 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR GOPU NANDILATH
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. CHERIAN .K. KURIAKOSE PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SHEEN JOSE MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. V.K BEENAKUMARI MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 09 Jun 2017
Final Order / Judgement

 

 

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ERNAKULAM.

Dated this the 9th day of June 2017

 

Filed on :22-02-2015

 

PRESENT:

 

Shri. Sheen Jose, Member.

Smt. Beena Kumari V.K. Member.

 

CC.No.118/2016

Between

 

M.A. Parthasarathy, : Complainant

S/o. R. Ayyappan, Proprietor, (By Adv. Kishore Kumar M.V.,

Manimangalath Paints, Adoor, Cochin Law Associates,

res. at Jyothi Nivas, Advocates and Legal Consultants,

Choorakode P.O., Door No. 40/242A, 1st Level,

Chathannoopuzha Muri, Justice Chandrasekhara Menon

Erath village, Adoor Taluk, Road, (Formerly Layam road)

Pathanamthitta- 691 551. Kochi-682 011)

 

And

1. M/s. Gopu Nandilath G. Mart, : Opposite parties

Door No. XXXIII/1116,7,8, (1st O.P. By Adv. Vinay Menon U)

Toll Junction, Edapapally,

Kochi-682 024,

rep. by its Managing Director,

Gopu Nandilath.

 

2. M/s. Samsung India Electronics (2nd O.P. By Adv. P. Jayabal Menon,

Pvt. Ltd., A-25, Ground Floor, M/s. J&J Associates, T3, III Floor,

Front Tower, Mohan Co-operative Empire Buildings, High Court East

Industrial Estate Suites, End, Kochi-682 018)

New Delhi-110 044,

rep. by its Managing Director.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

O R D E R

 

Sheen Jose, Member

Complainant present. 2nd opposite party also present. Matter settled between the parties in adalath. 2nd opposite party agreed to refund an amount of Rs. 68,000/- to the complainant within 30 days . Complainant directed to return the defective T.V. to the 2nd opposite party simultaneously.

Hence the complaint stands settled and dismissed. If the 2nd opposite party is failing which an interest @ 12% p.a. carry in the above said amount.

Pronounced in the open Forum on this the 9th day of June 2017.

 

Sd/-

Sheen Jose, Member.

Sd/-

Beena Kumari V.K., Member.

Forwarded/By Order,

 

Senior Superintendent.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. CHERIAN .K. KURIAKOSE]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. SHEEN JOSE]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. V.K BEENAKUMARI]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.