
Sharda Bansal filed a consumer case on 30 Jun 2016 against M/s Emaar MGF Land Limited in the DF-II Consumer Court. The case no is CC/442/2016 and the judgment uploaded on 22 Jul 2016.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH
======
Consumer Complaint No | : | 442 of 2016 |
Date of Institution | : | 22.06.2016 |
Date of Decision | : | 30.06.2016 |
Sharda Bansal daughter of Shri Dharam Pal Bansal, aged 38 years, resident of House No.201, Sector 7, Panchkula.
…..Complainant
1] M/s. Emaar MGF Land Limited Formerly known as M/s Emaar MGF Land Private Limited, through its Managing director, ECE House, 1st Floor, 28 Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi 110 001.
2] M/s. Emaar MGF Land Limited, through its Executive Business Development – Head, Branch Office: SCO No.120-122, 1st Floor, Sector 17-c, Chandigarh 160 017
3] M/s. Emaar MGF Land Limited, through its Branch Manager, Site Office: Sector 105, Landran Banur Highway, Opposite Reliance Petrol Pump, Mohali 160 062
….. Opposite Parties
Argued by:-
Sh.Vik as Jain, Counsel for the complainant.
PER JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER
1] We have heard the ld.Counsel for the complainant on the point of admission of the complaint.
2] Succinctly put, the complainant has subscribed for a 300 sq. yard plot in “Mohali Hills” project of the OPs, situated at Sector 105, Mohali, by making an upfront payment of Rs.10,35,000/- on 23.9.2006. A provisional allotment of the plot was made in the name of the complainant vide letter dated 11.5.2007 (Ann.C-2) and the same was agreed under the installment payment plan with the basic sale price of Rs.34.50 lacs with additional cost on account of EDC & PLC charges, total into Rs.36,19,104/- as per page 41 of Ann.C-2. A Plot Buyer’s Agreement too was entered into between the parties on 20.6.2007 and the parties were bound by the terms & conditions of said agreement. The complainant had made a major payment against the said allotted plot, amounting to Rs.34,46,604/- with the remaining balance of Rs.3,26,687/-, as per Ann.C-7. The remaining balance was payable at the time of execution of the conveyance deed of the plot in the name of complainant. The OPs in the meanwhile relocated the offered plot No.109-AB-476-300 to Plot No.108-PP-145-300 in the same project of Mohali Hills, vide their letter dated 14.4.2015 (Ann.C-8).
3] The complainant while preferring the present complaint has raised many objections and sought compensation on account of deficiency in service against the OPs and also on account of mental agony and harassment.
4] On perusal of the entire complaint along with annexures, this Forum could not locate even a single grouse of the complainant, which she had raised with the OPs and the same remained unaddressed giving rise to a consumer dispute, on account of which, the OPs could be held liable for deficiency in service on their part. Therefore, we are of the concerted view that the complainant should have raised her objection with the OPs, on each such aspect, that she has mentioned in her present complaint, and after having given an enough opportunity and caution, should have filed the present complaint. Hence, in our opinion, the present complaint is pre-mature, at this stage, and the complainant must raise these issues with the OPs for the reason that the footnote of Ann.C-8 clearly invites the observations/reservations of the complainant with regard to re-location of her plot, which she failed to raise with the OPs.
5] In view of the foregoing observations, the present complaint is dismissed on account of maintainability as the same is pre-mature and bereft of cause of action, at this stage.
The certified copy of this order be sent to the complainant free of charge, after which the file be consigned.
30th June, 2016 Sd/-
(RAJAN DEWAN)
PRESIDENT
Sd/-
(JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU)
MEMBER
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.