Karnataka

Tumkur

CC/7/2024

Sri.PRADEEP.M - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S ABR Construction, - Opp.Party(s)

T.S Janardhana

09 Feb 2024

ORDER

TUMAKURU DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Indian Red Cross Building ,1st Floor ,No.F-201, F-202, F-238 ,B.H.Road ,Tumakuru.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/7/2024
( Date of Filing : 17 Jan 2024 )
 
1. Sri.PRADEEP.M
S/o Mallikarjunaiah B.S, Aged about 38 years, residing at, Vokkodi road, Heggere,
TUMAKURU CITY
Karnataka
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/S ABR Construction,
H.No.2-50/4, Road No.06, Manair Nagar, Padmanagara Bypass, Karimnagar-505001, Telangana State, Represented by its Proprietor, Sri.Andem Babu Reddy,
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. SMT. G.T.VIJAYALAKSHMI. B.COM., LL.M. PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SRI.KUMAR N. B.Sc (Agri)., MBA.,LL.B. MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. SMT.NIVEDITA RAVISH. BA., LL.B (Spl). MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 09 Feb 2024
Final Order / Judgement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

09.02.2024.

//ORDERS ON ADMISSION//

BY SMT. G.T.VIJAYALAKSHMI – PRESIDENT.

          None appears for complainant from 23.01.2024 to till date. 

2.       We have perused the records. 

3.       The pleadings of the complainant discloses that, the complainant is an Employee of Opposite Party and salary was fixed at Rs.18,000-00 per month.  The complainant has to look after the entire affairs of the construction work of the OP.  In this regard, the Opposite Party executed a special power of attorney in favour of the complainant.  During the course of work, the complainant took a rented land and rent of Rs.3,000/- has been fixed.  The complainant has taken the possession of the land on 28.12.2021.  Thereafter the Opposite Party failed to pay the rent to the landlord and salary to the complainant.  Hence, the complainant claims Rs.1,49,400/- as salary arrears and Rs.40,000-00 towards rent arrears from Opposite Party with interest @ 18% p.a. and Rs.5,00,000/- as damages due to deficiency in service.  To claim salary and rent arrears, there are separate Authorities are established.

5.       In view of the above facts, we are of the opinion that, the above disputes does not come under the purview of the Consumer Protection Act.  Hence, the complaint is dismissed at the stage of admission.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SMT. G.T.VIJAYALAKSHMI. B.COM., LL.M.]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI.KUMAR N. B.Sc (Agri)., MBA.,LL.B.]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SMT.NIVEDITA RAVISH. BA., LL.B (Spl).]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.