For the Appellant (s) : Mr.---- Advocate (appearance not marked) Dated : 11.09.2024 ORDER (ORAL) Heard learned Counsel for the Appellant. Essentially the matter is against non-consideration and disposal of Misc. Application against the admission of the Complaint No.629 of 2019 by the learned State Commission vide order dated 05.07.2024. We have heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant who states that the Complainant is not a consumer under law and the order of the State Commission in admitting the Complaint is outrightly erroneous. He -2- further states that without considering the MA filed by the Opposite Parties, the learned State Commission admitted the Complaint. On being queried whether the said MA is part of this Revision Petition to be even considered, the learned Counsel regrets the same and seeks to bring the same on record. Heard the learned Counsel in detail and perused the records. Therefore, we find no merit in the arguments advanced. Admittedly, the learned State Commission is yet to consider the MA filed by him and the Appellant is yet to exhaust the legal remedies available before the State Commission. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, including non-filing of the MA in question, we find no merit in the present Appeal. The First Appeal No.685 of 2024 is, therefore, dismissed with the directions to the learned State Commission to consider the said MA filed by the Opposite Party as per law. All pending applications, if any, are also disposed of accordingly. | 
