Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/27/2016

The Managing Director, TNSCB - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mr.Vedharathinam - Opp.Party(s)

M/s T.Aarumugam cell No. 9841132827

31 Jul 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                             MEMBER

 

F.A. No.27/2016

 

(Against the Order dt.04.11.2015 made in C.C. No.94/2012 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chennai (South))

DATED THE 31^ST DAY OF JULY 2023

 

 

1. The Managing Director,

Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board / TNSCB,

No.5, Kamarajar Salai,

Chepauk,

Chennai – 600 005.

 

2. The Estate Officer,

Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board / TNSCB,

3^rd Street, Sivalingapuram,

K.K. Nagar,

Chennai – 600 078.                                          .. Appellants  / Opposite parties 1 & 2. 

 

-Versus-

Mr. Vedharathinam,

S/o. Gopal Pillai,

Indra Gandhi Nagar,

Velachery Village,

Adambakkam,

Chennai – 600 088.                                                   .. Respondent / Complainant.

 

Counsel for Appellants  / Opposite parties 1 & 2   : M/s. T. Arumugam

Respondent / Complainant                                    : Party in person

 

                This appeal coming up before us on 31.07.2023 for appearance of both parties and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:     

                                                                                  

Docket Order

 

         No representation for both parties.  

This appeal is posted today for appearance of both parties and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the appellant was not present.   Hence, passed it over and called again at 01.00 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, this appeal is dismissed for default.    No costs.

 

               

                Sd/-                                                                                              Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                        R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                     PRESIDENT