Registry has reported delay of 366 days in filing the present petition. Counsel for the petitioners does not dispute that there is such a delay in filing the present petition. But strangely enough, no application for condonation of delay has been filed along with petition. Counsel for the petitioners seeks an opportunity to file an application for condonation of said delay. We are not inclined to do so because ..2.. we notice that the conduct of the petitioners through out is as such that they are not entitled for any relief from this Commission. After filing the appeal before the State Commission, they did not pursue the matter, still the State Commission going by the entirety of the facts and circumstances and the material available on record, granted them substantial relief by reducing the amount of compensation to exactly half then what was awarded by the District Forum. We do not find any illegality, material irregularity or jurisdictional error in the order passed by the State Commission which calls for our interference u/s 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed.