Pondicherry

Pondicherry

CC/65/2009

Jayamani, S/o.Late.Sundarajan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mani Electronics, rep. by its Authorised Signatory - Opp.Party(s)

S.Savariram

11 May 2015

ORDER

Final Order1
Final Order2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/65/2009
 
1. Jayamani, S/o.Late.Sundarajan
3/68, Panangkuppam New Village, Kolyanur Cross Road, Villupuram Dist. working at Food Corpn of India, Vantrapet, Main Road, Puducherry.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Mani Electronics, rep. by its Authorised Signatory
No.385, Anna Salai, Puducherry
2. SUSME Electronics, rep. by itsAuthorised Signatory
No.126, Candappa Mudali Street, Puducherry
3. SANSUI Main Service Centre, rep. by its Authorised Signatory
Ground Floor, Marol Bhuvan, Marol Co-Op. Industrial Area, M.V. Road, Andheri(E), Mumbai-400 059
4. Kitchen Appliances India Ltd., (Electronic Division), rep. by its Authorised Signatory
C-6, Ashok Steel Compound, No.159, CST Road, Kalina, Santacruz (E) Mumbai-400 098.
Maharashtra
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. A.ASOKAN PRESIDENT
  PVR.DHANALAKSHMI MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PONDICHERRY

 

C.C.No.65/2009

 

Dated this the 11th day of May 2015.

 

M/s.Jayamani

S/o.Late.Sundarajan

No.3/68, Panangkuppam New Village

Kolyanur Cross Road, Villupuram District,

Working at Food Corp. of India,

Vantrapet, Main Road, Puducherry-1.                                                      …. Complainant

 

Vs.

1. M/s.Mani Electronics,

    Rep. by Authorised Signatory

    Having business at No.385, Anna Salai

    Puducherry-1.

 

2. M/s.Susme Electronics,

    Rep. by its Authorised Signatory

    Having business at No.126,

    Candappa Mudaliar Street,

    Puducherry-1.

 

3. M/s.Sansui Main Service Centre,

    Rep. by its Authorised Signatory

    Having office at Ground Floor,

    Marol Bhuvan, Marol Co-Op. Industrial Area,

    M.V. Road, Andheri(E), Mumbai-400 059.

 

4. M/s.Kitchen Appliances India Ltd.

    (Electronics Division),

    Rep. by its Authorised Signatory

    Having office at C-6, Ashok Steel Compound

    No.159, C.S.T Road, Santacruz(E),

    Mumbai-400 098.                                                                                    .... Opposite Parties

                                                                                   

 

BEFORE:

 

            THIRU.A.ASOKAN, B.A., B.L.,

            PRESIDENT 

 

Tmt. PVR. DHANALAKSHMI, B.A.,B.L.,

           MEMBER

 

 

                                   

FOR THE COMPLAINANT                       :  Thiru.S.Savariram, Advocate

FOR THE OPPOSITE PARTIES:O.P.1: Thiru.A.Viveganandane, Advocate.

                                       O.P. 2 to 4:   Thiru.K.Ravikumar, Advocate.

.

                                                                       

 

O R  D  E  R

                         

            This is a complaint filed u/s.12(3) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for :

  1. To direct the first opposite party to take back the defective product i.e. the SANSUI Colour Television Hard Rock 24 EYE 2000 W, purchased under the bill No.15143 dated 04.11.2007 and to refund the cost of the Television set to the tune of Rs.9990/- with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. under section 14(1)(c) of the C.P.C. Act.
  2. To direct the opposite parties to pay the complainant a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation for the hardship, humiliation, harassment, suffering and mental agony suffered by him upon the act of opposite parties on account of the deficiency of service on their part under section 14(1)(d) of C.P. Act.
  3. To direct the first opposite party to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- as cost of this complaint under section 14(1)(i) of C.P. Act.
  4. To grant such other relief as this Forum may deems fit and proper in the interest of justice.

 

Today the complaint was called.  The complainant present, OPs.2 to 4 present. Counsel present. The complainant counsel filed memo stating that the opposite parties voluntarily came forward to give brand new SANSUI  LED TV for substitute of the SANSUI TV under dispute and the same is accepted by the complainant and hence full satisfaction may be recorded and the complainant may be dismissed.  In view of the memo filed by the complainant, this complaint is hereby dismissed. No cost.

 

Dated this the 11th day of May 2015.

 

 

  1.  ASOKAN)

PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

(PVR. DHANALAKSHMI)

MEMBER

 

 

  

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. A.ASOKAN]
PRESIDENT
 
[ PVR.DHANALAKSHMI]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.