Kerala

Trissur

CC/13/108

Suresh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Manappuram Finance Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

P B Dinesan

20 Nov 2013

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
AYYANTHOLE
THRISSUR-3
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/108
( Date of Filing : 28 Feb 2013 )
 
1. Suresh
S/O Kunju,Vellanchery (H), M G Kavu
Thrissur
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Manappuram Finance Ltd
Rep by Managing Director,manappuram House,Valappad po
Thrissur
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Padmini Sudheesh PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SHEENA V V MEMBER
 
PRESENT:P B Dinesan, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 20 Nov 2013
Final Order / Judgement

20th day of November 2013

                                     C.C.108/13  filed on 5/3/13

 

Complainant:        Suresh, Vellanchery House,

                             P.O.Mulamkunnathukavu, Thrissur.

                             (By Adv.P.P.Dinesan, Thrissur)

 

Respondents:        1. Manappuram Finance Ltd., rep.by  Managing

                                 Director, Manappuram House, Valappad.P.O.,

                                 Thrissur.

                             2. Manager,  Manappuram Finance Ltd., Thiroor

                                 Branch, P.O.Mulamkunnathukavu, Thrissur.

                            

                  

                                                O R D E R

 

By Smt. Padmini Sudheesh, President:

          The complaint is filed to get back the pledged gold ornaments from the respondent.  It is seen that the complaint is not maintainable before the Forum because there is no hiring of service as stipulated under Consumer Protection Act.  It is the case that the complainant had pledged with respondent some gold ornaments and the dispute is with regard to interest rate.  According to complainant it is a consumer dispute and he has locus standy to approach the Forum.  In these kind of cases there is no consumer relationship as stated earlier and the relationship is that of debtor and creditor.  The complainant can very   well approach concerned civil court for the remedy and the Consumer Forum is not the proper

Forum.  Hence the complaint is found not maintainable.

 

          Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the open Forum this the 20th day of  November 2013.

 

                                                                             Sd/-

                                                                   Padmini Sudheesh, President.

                                                                             Sd/-

                                                                  Sheena.V.V, Member.

 

                             Appendix

                                  Nil

 

                                                                             Id/-

                                                                         President

 

 

                                                          Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Padmini Sudheesh]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SHEENA V V]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.