Kerala

Kozhikode

CC/235/2020

BINU - Complainant(s)

Versus

MANAGER/BRANCH CASHIER,BAJAJ FINANCE LTD - Opp.Party(s)

30 Jan 2024

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KARANTHUR PO,KOZHIKODE
 
Complaint Case No. CC/235/2020
( Date of Filing : 11 Nov 2020 )
 
1. BINU
MAVULLAKANDI,PADINJARE CHERIYAPARAMBATH,THIKKODI
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. MANAGER/BRANCH CASHIER,BAJAJ FINANCE LTD
GOPU NANDILATH GROUP,NANDILATH G MART,KOYILANDI,CHAMAS BUILDING MAIN ROAD,KOYILANDI-673305
2. MANAGER,GOPU NANDILATH GROUP
NANDILATH G MART,CHAMAS BUILDING KOYILANDI-673305
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. P.C .PAULACHEN , M.Com, LLB PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. V. BALAKRISHNAN ,M TECH ,MBA ,LLB, FIE Member
 HON'BLE MRS. PRIYA . S , BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 30 Jan 2024
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOZHIKODE

PRESENT: Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN, M.Com, LLB    : PRESIDENT

Smt. PRIYA.S, BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) :  MEMBER

Sri.V. BALAKRISHNAN, M Tech, MBA, LL.B, FIE: MEMBER

Tuesday the 30th day of January 2024

CC.235/2020

 

Complainant

Binu Mavullakandi,

Padinjare Cheriyaparambathu,

Thikkoti, Kozhikode.

Opposite Parties

  1.               Manager/ Cashier,

Bajaj Finance Ltd.

C/o Nandilath group,

Chamas Building,

Main Road, Koilandy,

                        Kozhikode.

(By Adv. Sri. Rajesh Odukkathil)

  1.               Manager,

Gopu Nandilath G Mart,

Chamas Building,

Main Road, Koilandy,

                        Kozhikode.

(By Adv. Sri. N. V. Sidharthan)

 

ORDER

By Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN  – PRESIDENT.

          This a complaint filed under section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act,2019 alleging deficiency of service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite parties.

  1. The opposite parties have filed written version denying all allegations and claims made in the complaint.
  2. The case is posted for evidence of the complainant as last chance today. The complainant remained absent and there is no representation for him. The onus is on the complainant to prove the allegations. The complainant is continuously absent and it appears that he is not interested in pursuing the matter. The allegations are not proved.

In the result, the complaint is dismissed. No order as to costs.  

 

Pronounced in open Commission on this, the 30thday of January, 2024.

 

Date of Filing: 11/11/2020

                   

                                           Sd/-                                                             Sd/-                                                  Sd/-

                                    PRESIDENT                                             MEMBER                                       MEMBER

 

 

APPENDIX

Nil

 

 

                                        Sd/-                                                                Sd/-                                                  Sd/-

                               PRESIDENT                                                  MEMBER                                       MEMBER

 

 

 

 

True Copy,      

 

 

                                                                                                                                                          Sd/-

                                                         Assistant Registrar.      

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. P.C .PAULACHEN , M.Com, LLB]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V. BALAKRISHNAN ,M TECH ,MBA ,LLB, FIE]
Member
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PRIYA . S , BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM)]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.