Kerala

StateCommission

CC/108/2018

RENJAN M M - Complainant(s)

Versus

MANAGER NIPPON TOYOTO - Opp.Party(s)

A P SUBHASH

08 Dec 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/108/2018
( Date of Filing : 04 Oct 2018 )
 
1. RENJAN M M
MANERKKATTU HOUSE KATTAPANA IDUKKI
IDUKKI
kERALA
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. MANAGER NIPPON TOYOTO
MUVATTUPUZHA
2. CEO TOYOTO KIRLOSKER MOTORS
BANGLORE
3. NIPPON MOTOR CORPORATION (P) LTD
NETTOOR PO KOCHI
4. BRIDGESTONE INDIA PVT LTD
PUNE DIST MAHARASHTRA
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SRI.T.S.P.MOOSATH PRESIDING MEMBER
  SMT.BEENAKUMARI.A MEMBER
  SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 08 Dec 2022
Final Order / Judgement

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

COMPLAINT NO. 108/2018

JUDGMENT DATED:08/12/2022

 

 

PRESENT:

 

SRI. T.S.P. MOOSATH: JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

SMT. BEENAKUMARI . A : MEMBER

 

SRI. K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN: MEMBER

 

COMPLAINANT:

Renjan M.M. S/o Mathew, Manarkatt House, Kochuthovala P.O,

Kattapana, Idukki District.

(By Adv. A.P. Subhash )

Vs.

OPPOSITE PARTIES:

1. The Manager, Nippon Toyota, Nippon Motor Corporation (P)

Ltd, 2/272/ A Valakam, Mekkadampu, Muvattupuzha.

(By Adv. Sasthamangalam R. Jayakrishnan , 1st and 3rd respondents )

2. The CEO, Toyota Kirloskar Motors (p) Ltd, No. 24, 10th Floor,

Cannera Block vittal Mallayar road, Bangalore, Pin. 560001.

3. Nippon Motor Corporation (P) Ltd, Nippon Toyota, X/314 K, NH 47 Bypass, Nettoor P.O, Kochi, CIN No. U50101KL1999PTCO, Kerala- 682 040

Represented by its Managing Director.

4. Bridgestone India Private Limited, Plot No. A43, Phase-11, MIDC Chakan,

Village Sawardari, Taluka Khed, Dist. Pune, Maharashtra 410 501,Represented by its Managing Director.

JUDGMENT

SRI. T.S.P. MOOSATH: JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

 

No representation for the complainant today also. Opposite parties 1,3,4 represented. For the last several postings there was no representation for the complainant. Hence the complaint was posted today for the appearance of the complainant. Today the complainant is not present and there is no representation for the complainant. It shows that the complainant is no longer interested in the prosecuting the matter. Hence the complaint is dismissed. No cost.

 

 

 

T.S.P. MOOSATH: JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

 

BEENAKUMARI . A : MEMBER

 

 

K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN: MEMBER

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sh/-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI.T.S.P.MOOSATH]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[ SMT.BEENAKUMARI.A]
MEMBER
 
 
[ SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.