This revision petition is directed against the order of the State Commission dated 18.07.2013 whereby the State Commission allowed the revision petition preferred by the respondent/OP against the interim order dated 09.07.2013 passed by the District Forum on the issue of pecuniary jurisdiction without even serving a notice of the revision petition on the petitioner/complainant. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the impugned order is violative of principle of natural justice. The State Commission has passed the impugned order without referring to the pleadings of the parties and without even giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner/complainant. It is thus urged that the impugned order may be set aside and the matter be remanded back to the State Commission for disposal of the revision petition after giving due hearing to the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has fairly conceded that the impugned order has been passed by the State Commission without serving notice of the revision petition on the petitioner / opposite party and submitted that respondents have no objection if the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the State Commission for disposal after giving due hearing to the parties. 4. On perusal of the impugned order, I find that it has been passed in absence of the petitioner without serving notice on him. The impugned order is, thus, violative of principles of natural justice. Therefore, it cannot be sustained. The impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the State Commission for deciding the revision petition on merits after hearing the parties. 5. The parties are directed to appear before the State Commission on 26.11.2013.