Learned counsel for respondent no. 3 has filed Vakalatnama. Heard learned counsel for the parties finally at admission stage. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that his appeal was dismissed in default, which may be restored. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that wrong date of 13.10.2013 was noted down by learned counsel for the petitioner appearing before the State Commission instead of 13.09.2013, so could not appear on 13.09.2013 and matter was dismissed in default. Hence, revision petition be allowed and impugned order be set aside. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection except objection of cost. As matter was dismissed in default on account of noting wrong date, we deem it appropriate to allow the revision petition, subject to cost. Consequently, revision petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and impugned order dated 13.09.2013, passed by the State Commission in First Appeal No. 152/2013, Kesri Devi vs. Mahindra and Mahindra Finance Ltd. & Ors. is set aside, subject to payment of Rs. 1,000/- as cost to respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Rs. 1,000/- to respondent no. 3 and appeal is restored at its original number. Parties are directed to appear before the State Commission on 25.02.2014 and the State Commission will dispose of the appeal in accordance with law.