NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/926/2012

SANJAY BAPURAO YAWALE & ANR. - Complainant(s)

Versus

MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & 2 ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. AKSHAY RINGE

20 Sep 2012

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 926 OF 2012
 
(Against the Order dated 21/10/2011 in Appeal No. 696/2008 of the State Commission Maharastra)
1. SANJAY BAPURAO YAWALE & ANR.
R/o Daryapur,Taluka Daryapur
Amravati
Maharastra
2. Shri Bapuraoji S/o Baliramji Yawale
R/o Daryapur,Taluka Daryapur
Amravati
Maharastra
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & 2 ORS.
Achalpur Division,Achalpur Through its Executive Engineer MSEB Achalpur
Amravati
Maharastra
2. The Junior Engineer, Maharastra State Electricity Board,
At Kolhapur, Taluka Bhatkuli
Amravati
Maharastra
3. The Assitant Enginer, Mahrastra Electricity Board,
Daryapur,Taluka Daryapur
Amravati
Maharastra
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 927 OF 2012
 
(Against the Order dated 21/10/2011 in Appeal No. 697/2008 of the State Commission Maharastra)
1. SMT. MANGALA & 5 ORS.
R/o Daryapur,Taluka Daryapur
Amrawati
Maharastra
2. Swapnil S/o Ashok Yawale
R/o Daryapur,Taluka Daryapur
Amravati
Maharastra
3. Vaibhav S/o Ashok Yawale
R/o Daryapur,Taluka Daryapur
Amravati
Maharastra
4. Ku Shubhangu S/o Ashok Yawale
R/o Daryapur,Taluka Daryapur
Amravati
Maharastra
5. Sau Shantibai W/o Bapuraoji Yawale
R/o Daryapur,Taluka Daryapur
Amravati
Maharastra
6. Shri Bapuraoji S/o Baliramji Yawale
R/o Daryapur,Taluka Daryapur
Amravati
Maharastra
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. MHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & 2 ORS.
Achalpur Division,Achalpur Through its Executive Engineer MSEB Achalpur
Amravati
Maharastra
2. The Assitant Enginer, Mahrastra Electricity Board,
Daryapur,Taluka Daryapur
Amravati
Mahrastra
3. The Junior Engineer, Maharastra State Electricity Board,
At Kolhapur, Taluka Bhatkuli
Amravati
Maharastra
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RAI, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :NEMO
For the Respondent :MR AJIT S BHASME

Dated : 20 Sep 2012
ORDER

         State Commission dismissed the appeal in default of appearance.  Limited notice was issued to the respondent to show cause as to why the impugned order be not set aside and the case remitted back to the State Commission to decide it afresh in accordance with law. 

Limited notice issued on 27.4.2012 is made absolute.  Impugned order is set aside and the case is remitted back to the State Commission to decide it afresh in accordance with law.

Parties, through counsel, are directed to appear before the State Commission on 1st November 2012.

Copy of this order be sent to the petitioners as well as their counsel for information.

 

 
......................J
ASHOK BHAN
PRESIDENT
......................
VINEETA RAI
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.