Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/42/2018

A.S.A.Zaheer Hussain - Complainant(s)

Versus

M.s.Amir Ali - Opp.Party(s)

A.L.Ramamoorthy

08 Apr 2022

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                        PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.42/2018

 

(Against the Order dt.03.05.2017 made in C.C. No.03/2017 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Tiruvarur)

DATED THE 08^TH DAY OF APRIL 2022

 

A.S.A. Zaheer Hussain,

No.7, 56-C,New Street,

Adiyakkamangalam,

Tiruvarur Taluk,

Tiruvarur.                                                                         .. Appellant / Opposite party.

-Versus-

M.S. Amir Ali,

S/o. Mr. Mohammad Sulthan,

No.5/753, Nagai Road,

Adiyakkamangalam Post,

Tiruvarur District,

Represented by his Agent,

Mr. V.V. Jayaraman,

Executive Member and Organizer,

Consumer Protection Organization,

A.V.R.M. Road,

Vijayapuram,

Tiruvarur.                                                                     ..  Respondent / Complainant.

 

Counsel for Appellant / Opposite party             : M/s. A.L. Ramamoorthy

Respondent / Complainant                               : Party in person

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 08.04.2022 for appearance of the respondent in person and for reporting settlement or for arguments (in list) and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

 

 

Docket Order

 

No representation for the respondent in person.  Appellant present.  When the matter is taken up for consideration, the Counsel for the appellant has filed a Memo stating that as per the compromise, the appellant has paid the entire award amount of Rs.56,000/- (Rupees Fifty six thousand only) to the respondent.   Memo recorded. 

In view of the Memo of Compromise, the appeal is dismissed as settled out of court.   No order as to cost.

The appellant is entitled to the Mandatory deposit.  Hence, the Registry is directed to discharge the mandatory deposit along with accrued interest in favour of the appellant.

 

               

               Sd/-                                                                                     Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                         R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT