After hearing counsel for the parties, we do not find any substance in this Revision Petition.  Finding recorded by the State Commission, that the petitioner was guilty of suppression of fact by not disclosing in the proposal form about the earlier policies taken by her, is a finding of fact which cannot be interfered with in exercise of revisional jurisdiction.

-2-

Under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 in Revisional jurisdiction this Commission can interfere only if the State Commission exercises jurisdiction not vested in it by law, or has failed to exercise a jurisdiction so vested, or has acted in the exercise of its jurisdiction illegally or with material irregularity.

We agree with the findings recorded by the State Commission and do not find that there has been any material irregularity in the exercise of jurisdiction on either of accounts mentioned in Section 21 of the Act.  Dismissed.