Kerala

Kozhikode

CC/281/2022

ABDUL JABBAR. P - Complainant(s)

Versus

LAVANYA E MART - Opp.Party(s)

23 Mar 2023

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KARANTHUR PO,KOZHIKODE
 
Complaint Case No. CC/281/2022
( Date of Filing : 28 Oct 2022 )
 
1. ABDUL JABBAR. P
OTHAYOTHUMMAL HOUSE,ARAPPEEDIKA,VATTOLI BAZAR P.O-673612
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. LAVANYA E MART
MUNDAKKAL TOWER,BALUSSERY MUKKU,VATTOLI BAZAR P.O-673612
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. P.C .PAULACHEN , M.Com, LLB PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. V. BALAKRISHNAN ,M TECH ,MBA ,LLB, FIE Member
 HON'BLE MRS. PRIYA . S , BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 23 Mar 2023
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOZHIKODE

PRESENT : Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN, M.Com, LLB : PRESIDENT

Smt. PRIYA.S, BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) :  MEMBER

Sri.V. BALAKRISHNAN, M Tech, MBA, LL.B, FIE: MEMBER

Thursday the 23rd day of March 2023

CC No. 281/2022

Complainant

Abdul Jabar P,

Othayothummal (H),

Arappeedika, Vattoli Bazar (P.O)

Kozhikode-673 612.

 

Opposite Party

Lavanya E Mart,

Mundakkal Tower,

Vattoli Bazar (P.O)

Balussery Mukku,

Kozhikode- 673 612.

 

ORDER

 

 

By Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN – PRESIDENT 

           This is a complaint filed under section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

  1.  The case of the complainant, in brief, is as follows:

On 29-08-2022 the complainant purchased a High Pressure Washer of Total Company paying Rs.6,500/-, from of the opposite party shop. On 19-09-2022 while using, the pipe of the said equipment became damaged and there was water leaking. There was neglect on the part of the opposite party to repair the same and redress his grievance. Hence the complaint.

  1. The opposite party remained ex-parte.
  2. The points that arise for determination in this complaint are :
  1. Whether there was any deficiency of service on the part of the opposite party, as alleged?
  2. Reliefs and costs.

 

  1. Point No.1 – The opposite party was set ex-parte. The case was posted for the evidence of the complainant several times. But the complainant also remained absent and did not file affidavit or adduce any evidence.  The fact that the opposite party was set ex-parte does not automatically entitles the complainant to get the relief sought for. It is for the complainant to prove the allegations in the complaint by adducing proper evidence. But the complainant in this case has utterly failed to prove his case. No deficiency of service as alleged is proved against the opposite party.

 

  1. Point No.2 :  In view of the finding on the above point, the complainant is not entitled to get the relief sought for and the complaint is only  to be dismissed. 

 

In the result, CC 281/2022 is dismissed. No order as to costs.

 

Pronounced in open Commission on this the 23rd day of March 2023.

 

Date of Filing: 28/10/2022

                                                                  

                                               

 

                                                                                            Sd/-

                                                                                   PRESIDENT  

  

                                                                                           Sd/-

                                                                                      MEMBER                        

 

                                                                                                                                                                                         Sd/-

                                                                                      MEMBER

 

 

                                                                                                                                                    Forwarded/ By Order

                                                                                                                                                 Sd/-

                                                                                      Assistant Registrar

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. P.C .PAULACHEN , M.Com, LLB]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V. BALAKRISHNAN ,M TECH ,MBA ,LLB, FIE]
Member
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PRIYA . S , BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM)]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.