Chandigarh

DF-I

CC/145/2010

Vianayak Vithalrao Buche - Complainant(s)

Versus

Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Neelam Singh, Inder Singh, SapnaRaheja

02 Jul 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 145 of 2010
1. Vianayak Vithalrao BucheR/o Flat No. 36/4 Sector-42/C Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Kingfisher Airlines Ltd.SCONo. 59-60 SEctor-9/D Cahndigarh (through its Incharge/Head)2. Kingfisher Airlines Limited, Western Express Highway Vile Parle(E) Mumbai-400099( Through its In Charge/Head)Mumbai3. Kingfisher Airlines Ltd.(Head office) 12th Floor UB Tower UB City No. 24 Vithal Mallya Road, Banglore-560001(Through its Incharge/Head)Banglore ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Neelam Singh, Inder Singh, SapnaRaheja, Advocate for
For the Respondent : Y.S.Dhillon , Advocate

Dated : 02 Jul 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DISTRICT FORUM-I, U.T.

CHANDIGARH

                                               

Complaint Case No. 145 of 2010

 

 

Vinayak Vithalrao Buche

 

                                                                                                  - Complainant

                                                Versus

 

1.            Kingfisher Airlines Limited, Chandigarh

2.            Kingfisher Airlines Limited, Mumbai

3.            Kingfisher Airlines Limited, Bangalore.

                                                                                                 -  Opposite Parties

 

Present:            None for Complainant.

Sh.Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv. proxy for Sh.Y.S.Dhillon, Advocate for OPs.

 

Dated, the 2nd day of July, 2010.

                                                            ORDER

 

                        The case was taken up today in the Lok Adalat. The matter has been settled between the parties. In view of the application of counsel for complainant for withdrawal of the complaint, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn.

                        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

                                                                                                PRESIDING OFFICER

            LOK ADALAT.

 

 

 

3rd MEMBER                         2nd MEMBER                   1st MEMBER



MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, MEMBERHONABLE MR. JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL, PRESIDENT DR. MRS MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA, MEMBER