Haryana

StateCommission

CC/361/2019

YOGINDER SINDHU AND ANOTHER - Complainant(s)

Versus

KASHI PROMOTOER PVT. - Opp.Party(s)

VIKRANT HOODA

13 May 2023

ORDER

 

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

HARYANA PANCHKULA

                                                                                               

     Date of Institution : 08.11.2019  

      Date of Pronouncement: 13.05.2023          

                                                             Date of final hearing: 13.05.2023

 

 

Consumer Complaint No.361 of 2019

1.      Yoginder Sindhu, R/o House No.1797, Sector-6, Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar, Haryana-124507.

2.      Pooja Sindhu, W/o Yoginder Sindhu, R/o House No.1797, Sector-6, Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar, Haryana-124507.

 

Through Counsel, Mr. Vikrant Hooda, Advocate

                                                          .….complainants.

Versus

1.      Kashi Promoters Pvt. Ltd. now Ruhil Promoteres Pvt. Ltd. through its Director, Sector-3, Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar, Haryana.

2.      Yashpal Sharma, Authorized Representative of Ruhil Residency, Sector-3, Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar, Haryana.

Through Counsel, Ms. Navneet Kaur, Advocate.

Opposite parties.

CORAM:    S.P. Sood, Judicial Member.

                  

Present:-    None for the complainants.

Mr. Aman Singh, proxy counsel Ms. Navneet Kaur, counsel for opposite parties along with Mr. Ravi Ranga, Authorized Representative of opposite parties.

                   

                                      O R D E R

 

PER   S.P. SOOD, PRESIDING MEMBER:

                   File taken up today before the National Lok Adalat.

2.                On the last date of hearing, i.e. 27^th March, 2023 Ms. Navneet Kaur, learned counsel for the opposite parties was placed on record the full & final settlement regarding the unit in question and stated at bar that the matter has been settled.

 

3.                Today, Reader of the Court attached with this Bench also get the requisite instructions by calling to the decree Holder-complainant on his cell phone and Shri Dharam Dev Sindhu, father of Mr. Yoginder Sindhu,complainant has ascertained that he is satisfied with the development made by learned counsel for Judgment Debtor-opposite party.

4.                In view of the above-mentioned development and as per the telephonic instruction received from Shri Dharam Dev Sindhu, father of Mr. Yoginder Sindhu, complainant, the present complaint stands dismissed as withdrawn being settled.

5.                A copy of this order be provided to all the parties free of cost as mandated by the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. This order be uploaded forthwith on the website of the Commission for the perusal of the parties.

6.                Application(s), pending, if any, stand disposed off accordingly in terms of this order.

7.                File be consigned to record room alongwith a copy of this order.

 

Pronounced on 13^th May, 2023

J.Y.                             

             S.P.Sood      

                                 Presiding Member

                                                                                                                      Lok Adalat