Pondicherry

StateCommission

CC/6/2015

C. Anandhi, D/o B. Chandramohan, - Complainant(s)

Versus

K. Sevugan alias Xavier, Proprietor, Universal Traders - Opp.Party(s)

Mr.A. Karunamoorthy

14 Jul 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUDUCHERRY
JUDGEMENT
 
Complaint Case No. CC/6/2015
( Date of Filing : 24 Jul 2015 )
 
1. C. Anandhi, D/o B. Chandramohan,
A.J.A. Villa, Moohambigai Nagar, Thanampalayam, Thavalakuppam, Pondicherry-605 007
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. K. Sevugan alias Xavier, Proprietor, Universal Traders
No. 10-5/11, Bhavani River Street, 3rd Cross, Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, Madurai-625 014
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.Pongiappan PRESIDENT
  Mr.S.Sundaravadivelu MEMBER
  Mrs.S.Oumasanguery MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 14 Jul 2022
Final Order / Judgement

This complaint has been filed under section 17 r/w.Sec.12,13, 14 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for the relief of direction, (1)directing the 1st opposite party to refund the amount paid by the complainant and 2nd opposite party bank alongiwth interest, loss of income and electrical bill expenses to a sum of Rs.30,10,469.50/- to the complainant, (2)directing the 1st and 2nd opposite parties to pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- as compensation to the complainant on account of mental agony, harassment and emotional distress suffered by the complainant due to unprofessional conduct of the opposite parties, (3)directing the 2nd opposite party to refund the amount of Rs.80,000/- alongwith interest paid by the complainant on 10.06.2013 and to recall the demand and recall of Advance notices issued by the 2nd opposite party, (4) directing the 2nd opposite party to cancel the security mortgage vide document no.7008/2012 dated 24.12.2012.
2. Notice was issued to the opposite parties. The reply was filed by the first opposite party. The complainant has been examined as CW.1 on proof affidavit, Exs.C1 to C5 marked. The case was posted for cross examination of CW.1.
3. Today when the case is came up for hearing, complainant absent, no representation for complainant. Counsel appearing for the opposite party is alone present. On verification of documents, if seems that the case is posted for appearance of the complainant as a last chance. For the reasons stated that the complainant is absent and also for the reason that the complainant is of the year 2015, the complaint is dismissed for default.
In the result, the complaint is dismissed for default. No costs.
Dated this the 14th day of July 2022

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.Pongiappan]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Mr.S.Sundaravadivelu]
MEMBER
 
 
[ Mrs.S.Oumasanguery]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.