Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/196/2018

M.G. Balasubramanian, Ariyalur-Tk (DT) - Complainant(s)

Versus

K. Murugan - Opp.Party(s)

PARTY IN PERSON

31 Mar 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                              BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                 Thiru.S.KARUPPIAH                                       ::  JUDICIAL  MEMBER

                                                 Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::   MEMBER

 

                                                                                             FA. No. 196/2018

(Against the order in C.C. No.55/2017, dated 7.6.2018, on the file of

District Consumer Forum,Ariyalur]

 

                                                                      DATED THIS THE 31^st DAY OF MARCH 2022

 

M.G.Balasubramanian,

S/o, Gurusamy,

4/284, West street,

Thirumanur,

Ariyalur District                                                  ..Appellant/Complainant

 

                                              Vs

Thiru. G.Murugan,

 Thasildhar,

Ariyalur  621 704                                             ..Respondent/Opposite party

 

 

 Appellant/Complainant                                : Party in person

Respondent/Opposite party                          : M/s A.Murugan

 

          This appeal coming on before us for appearance of both parties and for filing written arguments of both and for arguments or for dismissal, the non-prosecution of appellant, we made the following order in open court :-

Docket order

 

          No representation for both parties. This appeal is posted today for appearance of both and for filing written arguments of both and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant was not present. Hence, passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested  in prosecuting the case. The appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

 

   Sd/-                                                     Sd/-                                                            Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL       S.KARUPPIAH                                           R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                 JUDL.MEMBER                                           PRESIDENT