Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/379/2014

Universal Sompo General Insurance Co. Ltd., The Personal Manager - Complainant(s)

Versus

K. Baskaran & 2 ors - Opp.Party(s)

N.Vijayaraghavan-Applt.,

29 Mar 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                 BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                      Thiru.S.KARUPPIAH                                       ::  JUDICIAL  MEMBER

                                      Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::   MEMBER

 

                                                                                        FA. No. 379/2014

(Against the order in C.C. No.2/2013, dated 11.3.2014, on the file of

District Consumer Forum ,Nagapattinam]

DATED THE 29^th DAY OF MARCH 2022

 

Personal Manager,

Universal Sompo General Insurance Co.Ltd,

No. 2817, Capital Towers,

5^th floor, P.Wing,

554-555, Anna Salai,

Thenampettai, Chennai – 600 018                                              ..Appellant/3^rd opposite party

 

                                             Vs

 

1. K.Baskaran, S/o Krishnamurthy,

2/4 North street,

Poravachcheri village,

Sikkal post, Nagapattinam Taluk,                                              ..1^st Respondent/complainant

 

2. The Branch Manager,

Indian Overseas Bank,

Sikkal, Nagapattinam – 611 108

 

3. The General Manager,

TTK Health Care T.P.A (P) Ltd,

No.88, 2^nd Floor, Anmoal Pazhani,

G.N.Chetti, T.Nagar,

Chennai – 600 017                                                              ..Respondents 2&3/opposite parties 1 & 2

 

 Appellant/3^rd opposite party                        :  Party in person

1^st Respondent/complainant                         : party in person

2^nd Respondent/1^st opposite party                 : party in person

3^rd Respondent/2^nd opposite party            : served called absent

 

          This appeal coming on before us for appearance of both and for arguments in list or for dismissal, we made the following order in open court :-

                                                    Docket order

          No representation for both. This appeal is posted today for appearance of both and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant in person was not present, hence passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant in person has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

 

    Sd/-                                                 Sd/-                                                            Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL       S.KARUPPIAH                                           R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                    JUDL.MEMBER                                           PRESIDENT