Bihar

Muzaffarpur

CC/156/2014

Birandra Kumar, Ors. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Jitrendra Kr. Bharti - Opp.Party(s)

Sri Barkal Ali

25 Feb 2016

ORDER

                                                                        District Consumer Forum, Muzaffarpur

          Complain Case No. 156/2014

1. Birandra Kumar, S/o Baiju Ray  R/of Village- Rupauli Post- Gidha, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur
2. Niraj Kumar S/o- Anil Kr. Ray
3. Satyendra Choudhary S/o Late Kailash Choudhary
4. Rakesh Choudhary S/o not mentioned
5.  Hira Devi W/o Ganeshwar Pandit
6.  Vijay Kumar S/o  Ganeshwar Pandit
7.  Munni Devi W/o Manoj Kumar Sah
8. Ramesh Mahato S/o Late Shankar Mahato
9. Paltan Mahato S/o late Shankar Mahato
10. Manjur Alam S/o Abdul Manann
11.  Chinta Devi S/o Umesh Ray
12. Gulvariya Devi S/o Kalicharn Ram
13.  Bhardul Ram S/o Late Phaguni Ram
14. Sanjit Kumar S/o Mohan Rajak
15. Sita Devi S/o Shiv Pd. Sah
16. Virendra Ray S/o Shankar Ray
17. Priti Devi W/o  Ashok Ray
18. Janki Devi W/o Sikindra Ray
19. Renu Devi W/o Birindra Kr. Singh
20. Nibhary Kumar S/o Narendra Kr. Singh
21. Suman Kr. S/o Satendra Choudhary, R/o Gram Rupauli , Post- Gidha, P.S.- Saraiya District-Muzaffarpur  1 to 21
22. Md.  Ayub, S/o- Aphajal Miya
23. Mantu Kr. S/o Ram Bhajan Singh
24. Sangita Devi W/o Raj Kishor Ray
25. Anup Ram S/o Lal Bahadur Ram
26. Raj Kumar Rai S/o Sakaldev Ray
27. Rina Devi S/o Mahesh Ray
28.  Mukesh Kr. S/o- Rajal Ray
29. Dilip Kr. S/o Mahadev Sah  Applicants Nos- 22 to 29 R/o vill- Gopinathpur  Dokara Post + P.S Saraiya District- Muzaffarpur
30. Pintu Kr. S/o-  Pati Srivastva
31. Lalita Devi W/o Denesh Ram
32. Balraj Sahani  S./o Bhardulli Sahani
33.  Labhali Km. S/o Pankaj Kr. Singh
34. Santi Devi W/.o Jitrendra Sahani  Complainants Nos. 30 to 34 R/of villa- Hariharpur Post- Rupauli, Via- Gidha, P.S.- Saraiya District- Muzaffarpur
35.  Kanti devi W/o  Nandlal Mahato
36. Arjun Mahato S/o Late- Gopal Mahato
37.  Bhagawati Devi W/o Kameshwar Pd. Singh  Applicants Nos 35 to 37 R/of villa- Sakara post Jaitupur, P.S- Saiya , District- Muzaffarpur
38. Ajay Kumar S/o- Jagarnath Choudhary  R/o village+post Rajarampur P.S- Saraiya District- Muzaffarpur
39.  Hari Kishor Kr. S/o- Siyaram Singh
40. Rakesh Kr. S/o Basude Sah. Applicant No.-39,40 R/o vill- Naya Tola Muzaffarpur P.S& P.S- sariya, District- Muzaffarpur
41. Raju Kr. Singh S/o late Bachchala Singh
42. Pawan Kumar Singh S/o Late Ramswarup Sahi  Applicant No. R/o 41 to 42 Villa- Mohamdpur Post +P.S. Saraiya District Muzaffarpur
43. Janti Devi, W/o Gullu Sah
44.  Mayadevi W/o Shiv Kr. Singh  applicants  no 43 to 44   R/o Village+ Harpurbeni Post – Rupauli P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur
45. Lakhindra Kr. S/o Satynarayan Paswan, R/o  Village  Basara alias  chak Ramdan Post + P.S.-  Vaishali District- Vaishali
46. Sanjiv Kr. S/o Jhapsi Mahato R/o  Villa+post- Gopalpur Neura P.S.- Saraiya District- Muzaffarpur
47. Saukatali S/o Md. Yusuph,  R/o Village- Rampur Kesho Malahi, Post Malahi, P.S.- Paru District- Muzaffarpur
48. Nilam devi W./o Mukesh Sah,  R/o Vill- Bisarpatti, Post Rupauli,  P.s- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur
49. Vinod Thakur, S/o  sheo Pujan Thakur,  R/o Vill- Jagarnathpur Dokana P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur
50. Shambhu Thakur S/o late- Dhaur  Thakur,  R/o Vill- Pokharaira, P.S- Saraiya, District- Muzaffapur
51.  Mukesh Kr. S/.o Nagendra Sah, R/o Vill+post- Pokharaira, P.S.- Sairaya, Disstrict- Muzaffarpur
52. Sonelala Ram S/o late- Jatu Ram , R/o Vill- Harpur, P.S- Saraiya District- Muzaffarpur
53. Radha Mohan Pd.  Ganilala Sah,  R/o Villl- Wasudevpatti, Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur.
54. Mithilesh Kr. S/o Kapildev Thakur  R/o Vill- Bayadih, post- Raghunathpur, P.S- Saraiya/Paru, District- Muzaffarpur
55. Sarda Devi W/o- Vishundev Ray,  R/o Vill+post- Raghunathpur, P.S-Paru, District- Muzaffarpur
56. Chandan Kr.  S/o Suresh Ram, R/o Vill- Gopidhanwat Dokra P.S- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur ……………………………...……Complainants 

                          V/s

1. Jitrendra Kr. Bharti S/o Sri Darika Sah, R/o Vill- Shekhadhanwat Post- Gidha, P.S- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur, Pin Code- 843106
2. Vipin Singh yadav, Managing Director, Real Son Shin Group of companies Kailash Bihar City Central Gwaliyar M.P. Pin 474001 Reg. No.- U15423 MP 2009 P.L.C 021485, present address Vipin Singh Yadav Pin no- 02258136 Vill- Balaji Nagar Bhind M.P.- 477001
3. Saurav Panday ( Managing Director) Real Son Shin Group of  Companies Rajghat chauhraha Ayodhya Faijabad, M.P.- 474011
4. Shiv Pd. Ghop D-45  P.N.N.S, P.S- Kalyani,  West Bangal, India Pin- 741251………………………………….................…opposite parties.

Date of order- 25-02-2016

                                                                                                  Present.

1. Shri Govind Prasad Singh

                                                                                                                        President,

       Consumer Forum Muzaffarpur

2.  Smt. Archana Singh

      Member

       Consumer Forum Muzaffarpur

For complainants-    Sri Barkal Ali    - Advocate

For opposite party-      not appeared.  

Order

           

            The complainant have filed his case of claim of Rs. 20,00,000/- on 07-11-14.

 

            The case of complainant appears from his complaint petition supported with an affidavit that       they were under impression and assurance by the opposite party that they have launched scheme of policy  in which the amount  deposited by them became  doubled within minimum time and they have get  joined the complainants  in this scheme  they have get the complainant no.1 Virendra Kr.  On 04-01-2012 and given him  policy no.- as 201. AD000400 and with the help of this complainant  no.-1 the opposite party have successed   under allurement  for joining of about 200 persons  who have deposited the money in the said company and the opposite party no.-1 was successfully getting deposited the money from complainants and others continuously. The complainants contact  in April 2014 after Maturity to the opposite party no.-1 and others opposite parties who have given assurance that their amount should be paid as early as possible and the complainants were dragged.  Latter on when the bond paper was given to them they acknowledge that the bond paper was in the name of  Real Son Shine  Corporation Ltd. They have objected and lastly no payment was made to them accordingly they have served the legal notice and filed this case with aforesaid claim including the deposited money Rs. 12,13824/-  

The complainant has filed Xerox copies of certain papers i.e.  legal notice dated 28-08-2014 with postal receipts, registration letters in the name of complainants  for the plan of monthly payment in total installments commenced  from 22-08-2013 and on separate date .

In this case notice against opposite party were send through registered post but the opposite party never turn up and the notices had not been received un served as such it was presumed that the notices were sufficiently served to the opposite party and the case proceeded for Ex. Party hearing, accordingly case has been heard Ex. Party only for the complainant.

Considering the allegation  and documents filed by the complainant the alleged deposited has been shown in a statement self made  maintained  legal notice. It was required for the complainant that how when share and in what bank they have deposited their installment by what installment . The complainant  have not filed any documents  of agreement by which they have started payment  only they have filed the registration latter in their name  they have not  found able to corroborate  the fact that they have deposited the money as per its installment which was necessary  for them. It can be calculated without any payment receipts having no any agreement paper that they have deposited the said money which will be completed for double.  The period when it became double  has also not been alleged in their complaint petition, only it has been found mentioned that the money deposited by them will became double within minimum period as such we are of the opinion that  the complainant is not found able to prove his case.

            Accordingly the case and the same is dismissed with cost.

 

Member                                                                                 President