1.  The case of the complainant in brief is that he had deposited daily saving pass Book for Rs.30/- per day  on 1.1.2012 In such way he was deposited money before the O.P. No.1 on till  may 2013.When the complainant  heard irregularity of the company stopped depositing further asked the O.PNno.1  for return back of his deposited amount. The complainant in this  way deposited Rs. 15,300/-   to the O.P,No.1.The complainant  forced to file this dispute against the O.Pss his money has not been returned and filed this case for a direction to return back his deposit amount along with compensation.

    2.After being noticed the O.P No.1 appear and filed their separate counter in this case. The case of the O.P.No.1 is that the case is not maintainable against them. The money was deposited before the O.PNo.3 directly. As the office of the O.P had been closed the money could not be released in favour of the complainant   and pray for dismissal of the case.Thoguh notice has been issued to O.P No.3 although R.P. with A.D He could not appear in this case.

    3.The Point for determination in this case whether the complainant is a consumer against theO.P. Whether any deficiency of service e and unfair trade practice has been caused by the O.P. against the complainant.

      4.The complainant filed documents Xerox copy of the pass book in faovur  of him which shows the deposit. The O.PNo.1 and 2 also admit that money has been deposited before the O.PNo.3 as such the complainant is consumer against the O.Ps.The O.P could not return back his deposited amount though several  steps  has been taken by him which shows deficiency of service and  unfair trade practice mad by him.

       Taking into consideration the case and documents submitted by both O.P. we direct the O.PNo.3 return back his deposited amount ie. Rs.15,300/- (Rupees fifteen thousand  three hundred )only with interest within one month from the date of this order till realization. The O.PNo. 3 is further directed to pay Rs.1,000/(Rupees one thousand ) only towards compensation and cost of litigation to the complainant failing which the complainant is at liberty to take steps against the O.P. for realization of awarded amount. The case against O.PNo.1 and 2 is dismissed without cost.

      Order pronounced in the open court under the seal and signature of the forum this the 4^th day of November, 2015.