Uttar Pradesh

StateCommission

A/2232/2014

Seema Sony - Complainant(s)

Versus

Jila Adhikari - Opp.Party(s)

Self

29 Jul 2015

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UP
C-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010
 
First Appeal No. A/2232/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated 13/08/2014 in Case No. C/91/2013 of District Sonbhadra)
 
1. Seema Sony
Sonbhadra
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Jila Adhikari
Sonbhadra
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Virendra Singh PRESIDENT
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

 STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

                                   UTTAR PRADESH, LUCKNOW

                                      APPEAL NO. 2232 OF 2014

           (Against the judgment/order dated 13-08-2014 in Complaint

        Case No.120/2013 of the District Consumer Forum, Sonebhadra)

 

Seema Soni, D/o Late Jaya Sree Soni

R/o Dharmshala Chowk

Tehsil  Robertsganj-231216

District Sonebhadra                                                  ...Appellant/Complainant

                                                     Vs.

 

  1. District Magistrate/President District

 Consumer Forum, Sonebhadra

  1. Chief Medical Officer, Sonebhadra.
  2. Chief Medical Superintendent

District Joint Hospital Lodhi

Sonebhadra                                                       ...Respondent/Opposite Party

BEFORE:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDRA SINGH, PRESIDENT

HON’BLE MRS. BAL KUMARI, MEMBER

For the Appellant        :       None appears.

For the Respondent     :            -

 

Dated : 29-07-2015

                                                  JUDGMENT

          MR. JUSTICE VIRENDRA SINGH, PRESIDENT(ORAL)

          This appeal is put up today. No one appeared on behalf of the appellant. The impugned order dated 13-08-2014 pertaining to dismissal of the complaint of the complainant/appellant on the ground that the Government Hospital may not be liable for deficiency in medical services as there being no payment made by the appellant/complainant and the complainant being not the consumer, has been challenged by way of this appeal sent by post on 28-10-2014. 

The appeal being defective, several times the complainant was asked to remove the defects but neither the appellant/complainant appeared; nor the defects have been removed, which shows that the appellant is reluctant to proceed with the, hence the appeal is hereby dismissed in default of the appellant. 

 

                                                                              ( JUSTICE VIRENDRA SINGH )

                                                                                                             PRESIDENT

 

 

               ( SMT. BAL KUMARI )

  MEMBER

            Pnt.

  

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Virendra Singh]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.