Heard counsel for the petitioner on limitation and also on merit of the matter.  In fact, the application of condonation does not even show when the certified copy of the order was received by the petitioner.  It was made available by the Railway Board on 25.5.2010 and sent to Southern Railway Chennai for necessary action on 9.7.2010.  There is no explanation for condoning the delay in pursuing the matter.  In our opinion, no sufficient cause has been given for condoning the delay of 69 days.  The revision is liable to be dismissed, on this count alone.

Even on merits, we find that there are concurrent findings of two fora below. Sr. Citizen, passenger in question was awarded Rs.15,000/- and cost of Rs.3000/- for inconvenience suffered by him and his wife.  The complainant had confirmed tickets and had to suffer inconvenience in shifting his luggage consisting of 5 items through six bogies in a moving train.  According to the complainant, they were compelled to shift and were allotted two side berths Nos.23 & 24.   Keeping in view that the award made by the fora below  is just, fair and equitable.  It cannot be said to be out of proportion so as to interfere in the revisional jurisdiction  under Section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as we do not find any jurisdictional error, illegality or material irregularity in the orders of fora below.  

Therefore, we do not find any merit in this revision.  The revision is dismissed both on the ground of condonation of delay as also on merits, with no order as to cost.