NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/3224/2009

R.K. ANEJA & ANR. - Complainant(s)

Versus

ICICI BANK LTD. & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

CAPT. ARUN SHARMA

07 Jan 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 3224 OF 2009
(Against the Order dated 18/05/2009 in Appeal No. 195/2009 of the State Commission Chandigarh)
1. R.K. ANEJA & ANR.Through Their G.P.A. Shri Ashok Dass ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. ICICI BANK LTD. & ANR.Authority through Its Estate Officer/ Administrator ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

For the Petitioner :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 07 Jan 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

No one appears even on second call. It shows reluctant of petitioners to prosecute the proceedings. The revision petition in the circumstances, is dismissed for default. Even on merit, we find that both fora below have recorded concurrent finding about filing of second complaint by petitioners barred by res judicata. There being no merit, revision petition merits dismissal on this score also.

DISMISSED