Haryana

Panipat

CC/315/2022

Maa Collections - Complainant(s)

Versus

Hero Fincorp Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Shri R.K. Jiwan

29 Oct 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PANIPAT
 
Complaint Case No. CC/315/2022
( Date of Filing : 03 Nov 2022 )
 
1. Maa Collections
Plot No. 123-124, Sector-29, Part-I, HUDA, Panipat through its Proprietor Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Gupta.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Hero Fincorp Limited
Corporate Office 09, Basant Lok, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi-110057, through its Managing Director.
2. Hero Fincorp Limited
Branch Office G.T. Road, Panipat, through its Branch Manager.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Dr. R. K. Dogra PRESIDENT
  Dr. Rekha Chaudhary MEMBER
  Mr. Vinit Kaushik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Shri R.K. Jiwan, Advocate for the complainant.
......for the Complainant
 
Opposite parties already ex parte vide order dated 01.06.2023.
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 29 Oct 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                    No evidence of complainant is present. A date is requested on behalf of the complainant, which is opposed. Heard. This case is continuing for evidence of the complainant from 01.06.2023 and today is last opportunity on payment of costs Rs.500/-. Even cost has not been paid by the complainant and no efforts has been made by the complainant to produce the evidence. Moreso, the complainant has already availed eight effective opportunities including four last opportunities. Hence, there are no sufficient grounds for adjourning this case for the purpose of the evidence of the complainant. Hence, the evidence of the complainant is hereby closed by order of this Commission.

 2.               This complaint has been filed against the respondents seeking claim of Rs.1,50,000/- alongwith compensation to the tune of Rs.10,000/- alongwith Rs.22,000/- as litigation expenses  as the claim of the complainant has not been given by the respondents. In written statement, all the allegations have been denied by the opposite parties and dismissal of the complaint was prayed for.

3.                As the complainant has come before this Commission for seeking relief, the onus was on the complainant to prove his case by adducing cogent and convincing evidence. Since the complainant has not produced any evidence on record despite several effective opportunities as stated above and hence, there is no iota of evidence on record to substantiate the allegations of the complaint. Hence, the present complaint is hereby dismissed in lacking of evidence. However, both the parties are left to bear their own costs.

4.                This order be communicated to the parties free of costs and file be consigned to the record-room.

 
 
[ Dr. R. K. Dogra]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Dr. Rekha Chaudhary]
MEMBER
 
 
[ Mr. Vinit Kaushik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.