Haryana

Rohtak

CC/19/442

Shemsher - Complainant(s)

Versus

HDB Financial Service Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Anurag Malik

10 Feb 2022

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.
Haryana.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/19/442
( Date of Filing : 04 Sep 2019 )
 
1. Shemsher
S/o Sh. Duli Chand R/o Village Bhaini Surjan, Pana Matu, Tehsil Meham, District Rohtak.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. HDB Financial Service Ltd.
Through Sr. Branch Manager, Rohtak Road, N.H. 9, City Meham, Tehsil Meham, District Rohtak. Service through local office Shop No. 398/28 Ist Floor, Arome Surgical house, Model Town, Delhi Road, Near HDFC Bank, Rohtak.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian PRESIDENT
  Mrs. Tripti Pannu MEMBER
  Dr. Shyam Lal MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 10 Feb 2022
Final Order / Judgement

Before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rohtak.

 

                                                                        Complaint No. : 442.

                                                                        Instituted on     : 4.9.2019.   

                                                                        Decided on       :  10.2.2022.  

 

Shemsher son of Sh. Duli Chand, R/o village Bhaini Surjan, Pana-Matu, Tehsil Meham, Distt. Rohtak.

 

                                                                                                ………..Complainant.

                                                            Vs.

HDF Financial Services Ltd. through its Sr. Branch Manager, Rohtak Road, N.H. 9, City Meham, Tehsil Meham District Rohtak(Financer of Truck no.HR46D-6487) Service through Local Office shop no.398/28, Ist Floor, Aroma Surgical House, Model Town, Delhi Road, near HDFC Bank, Rohtak.                                                                                                                                             …….Opposite party.

 

Present:          Shri Anurag Malik, Advocate for the complainant.

                        Shri Harsh Bhargva, Advocate for the opposite party.  

 

                        Ld. Counsel for the complainant made a statement that matter has been compromised with the opposite party, so he withdraws the present complaint.

            In view of the statement made by ld. Counsel for the complainant, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn being settled. Copy of this order be supplied to the parties free of cost.

                                    File be consigned to the record after due compliance.

Dated : 10.2.2022.

 

 

Member                                 Member                                 President

                                                                                                DCDRC, Rohtak

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Mrs. Tripti Pannu]
MEMBER
 
 
[ Dr. Shyam Lal]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.