NCDRC

NCDRC

OP/78/1999

M/S. G.M. WORSTED SPINING - Complainant(s)

Versus

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY - Opp.Party(s)

MR. ARUN K. MALHOTRA & RAJAN KHANNA

28 Jun 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHICONSUMER CASE NO. 78 OF 1999
1. M/S. G.M. WORSTED SPININGMILLS P. LTD. OFFICE AT B - 86 GREATER KAILASH PART - I NEW DELHI - 110048 ...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYAUTHORITY HUDA THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR SECTOR - 18 CHANDIGARH ...........Opp.Party(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. BATTA ,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RAI ,MEMBER
For the Complainant :NEMO
For the Opp.Party :NEMO

Dated : 28 Jun 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Learned counsel for the complainant and counsel for opposite party present. Learned counsel for the complainant states that he has instructions from the complainant to withdraw this complaint. He, therefore, prays that the complaint be allowed to be withdrawn. The complaint is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs.



......................JR.K. BATTAPRESIDING MEMBER
......................VINEETA RAIMEMBER