We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Considering the chief bone of contention of the revision petitioner that the restoration power was with the fora below, in view of the scorts Limited and Anr. vs. Harachat Bai & Ors.[III (2005) CPJ 123 (NC)], we find it difficult to appreciate such contention in the light of three Judges Bench Judgement of the Supreme Court in ajeev Hitendra Pathak & Ors. Vs. Achyut Kashinath Karekar & Anr.(Civil Appeal No. 8155 of 2001). In view of the legal difficulty in entertaining the present revision petition, we dispose off the revision petition with liberty granted to the revision petitioner to take appropriate proceedings as may be permissible under the Law. The question of limitation is also kept open and liberty granted to explain the same with aid of section 14 of Limitation Act.