Telangana

StateCommission

A/357/2017

The Manager Manappuram General Finance and Leasing., - Complainant(s)

Versus

Gunda Chandra Shekar Reddy - Opp.Party(s)

Sri. D.V. Srinivasa Rao

31 Jul 2018

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Telangana
 
First Appeal No. A/357/2017
( Date of Filing : 16 Oct 2017 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/04/2017 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/7/2012 of District Khammam)
 
1. The Manager Manappuram General Finance and Leasing.,
Khammam Branch, Ist floor, Near Vinoda Talkies, Khammam 506001
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Gunda Chandra Shekar Reddy
S/o Ram Reddy, aged about 34 years, R/o H.No 8-3-14, Industrial Area, khanapuram Haveli, Khammam Dist
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri. K. Ramesh JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 31 Jul 2018
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION OF TELANGANA (Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) AT HYDERABAD

 

FA NO.357 OF 2017

AGAINST ORDERS IN CC NO.2/2012

(on the file of District Consumer Forum, Khammam)

 

Between:

 

The Manager, Manappuram

General Finance and Leasing Ltd.,

Khammam branch, 1st Floor,

Near Vinoda Talkies, Khammam- 506 001.

…Appellant/Opposite party

 

          And

 

Gunda Chandra Shekar Reddy

S/o Ram Reddy, aged about 34 years,

R/o H.no.8-3-14, Industrial Area,

Khanapuram Haveli,

Khammam Town and district.

…Respondent/Complainant

 

Counsel for Appellant               :         Sri D.V.Srinivasa Rao

Counsel for Respondent           :         Unserved

 

          This is an appeal filed by the Appellant feeling aggrieved by the orders dated 03.04.2017 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Khammam district in CC No.2/2012 seeking to allow the appeal by setting aside the orders of forum below.

 

QUORUM: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL, PRESIDENT

And

SRI K.RAMESH, MEMBER.

 

Tuesday, the Thirty First day of July

Two thousand eighteen

.

Oral Order : (Per Hon’ble Justice Sri M.S.K. Jaiswal, President).

 

***

 

Today also there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.  No steps taken in spite of specific direction.  Proof of service on the Respondent is not filed.  Even though the matter is passed over till lunch time, none has appeared.  Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

 

 

 

 

 

PRESIDENT                               MEMBER

      Dated 31.07.2018

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri. K. Ramesh]
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.